AI Rate Professor

Foothill College · English

Susana Huerta

ENG1A · ENGL1T · ENGL1BH · ENG110 · ENG220 · ENGL100 · SOC1 · ENGLISH100 · ENGLISH1B · ENG100110 · ENGL209 · ENGENG · ENG209 · ENGL110 · 2O9 · ENG100 · ENGLISH209 · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take Susana Huerta if you want to improve your writing and can handle heavy work, strict standards, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy ReadingStrong FeedbackStrict AttendanceImproves Writing
  • Many students say she is demanding, strict, and not an easy A, especially for essays and reading.
  • Positive reviews emphasize that and high standards can make students much better writers.
  • Negative reviews criticize heavy , and harsh or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

A good grade is possible, but comments repeatedly say students , and revise under tough grading standards.

Both formats show high effort, with online reviews adding stricter time pressure and and sustained work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course content is writing-heavy and often described as challenging, with complex expectations and demanding reading and essay work.

Online reviews stress workload density, while and class preparation.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Multiple in-person reviews say she notices lateness and absences and .

Strict attendance evidence is almost entirely in-person, while online reviews focus .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and feedback, but many warn against taking her for an easy or low-stress class.

term, while online reviews are more concerned about workload and deadlines.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Many students call her a tough or , though some say effort, office hours, and communication can help.

Format shift

mentioning high standards and in-person comments repeatedly calling her tough.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews frequently mention lots of , and long weekly time demands.

Format shift

Online reviews cite 15-20 hours or multiple essays due quickly, while and reading.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Her teaching is polarizing, but , and structure with improving their writing.

Format shift

, while online reviews are more mixed because workload and timing dominate.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears centered on essays, reading work, homework, projects, participation, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and assignments, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are polarized but , and growth-focused while assigning lots of reading, essays, and .

Main concern

Students who want an easy and workload frustrating.

What students said

“She is a , but she gives a lot of ”
ENGL1BH
“Tons of .”
ENG110
“ if you're into easy As.”
ENGENG

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews describe high workload, strict or , and tough writing standards.

Main concern

Online students report too much work in too little time and very high standards.

What students said

“I would spend anywhere from 15-20hrs.”
ENGL1BH
“too much work excepted in very little time.”
English1B
“Will be tough on your writing, though it's for the better.”
ENGL1BH

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though , and a final as part of the workload.

Essays During Finals WeekMidterm MentionedFinal MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove format, proctoring, or open-book policy.

EssaysIn-Class EssaysMidterm MentionedFinal Mentioned
“about 3 essays, midterm, final.”
ENG110
“Just read and do the 4 essays and the 2 inclass essays and you’ll get the grade you want.”
ENG110

Online

Online reviews mention two essays during finals week but do not clearly prove webcam, .

Finals Week EssaysNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ essay from a book and a reflective essay.”
English1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you're into easy As. If you want to be prepared for University work, she'll help you do that.”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“She is a , but she gives a lot of and is willing to help you work through problems if you have them outside of the classroom.”

⚖️

28/100

“She is a very smart lady and is nice, but she makes simple concepts extremely complex”

📚 Workload Intensity

22/100

“Tons of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She honestly makes you SUCH a better writer in the long run.
  • She systematically broke everything down into laymen terms so that anyone could follow the curriculum and become an academic writer.
  • She sometimes made assignments or topics seem harder than it was, but overall, her class wasn't too bad.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is not an easy A (this is college people!), but if follow the curriculum she has set up, you will do very well.
  • Her standards for writing are very high.
  • This teacher only teaches the things that she's interested in, a bunch of boring subjects.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support & Character

  • She treats us like humans, not like lowers.
  • She maybe tough, but she don't judge quickly like I did.
  • Always willing to , and she's very down to earth.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Forty reviews over a long time span provide rich, consistent evidence of a demanding but often impactful writing instructor.

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 510
3 out of 55
2 out of 55
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG11014 reviews
ENG1A4 reviews
ENG1003 reviews
ENGL1103 reviews
ENGL1BH3 reviews
Show 12 more courses
ENG2092 reviews
2O91 review
ENG1001101 review
ENG2201 review
ENGENG1 review
ENGL1001 review
ENGL1T1 review
ENGL2091 review
ENGLISH1001 review
English1B1 review
ENGLISH2091 review
SOC11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 3

B range

5

B+ 4 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values