AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Lloyd Benson

ACTG1C · ACCOUNTING · ACCT301 · F21ACTGF001C · ACCT1C · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
68.75%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you can follow a structured online accounting course independently, but if you need flexible deadlines or hands-on teaching.

Best fit · Self Taught ProOrganized but MixedHeavy HomeworkSelf-Teaching RequiredExtra Credit HelpsTest Heavy
  • Student and complaints about limited teaching support.
  • Accounting content is not easy, and , and reading.
  • A grades are possible through consistent work, , and assignment completion, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is possible with , and , but students repeatedly say the class takes real work and self-discipline.

Online evidence is more polarized, while but the exams and material still require practice.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Accounting concepts are often described as tough or not easy, even when the .

Both formats describe difficult material, though online students more .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews mention weekly participation and strict timelines but do not show a .

Online evidence points to deadlines and weekly tasks, while in-person evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

, but the recommendation is weakened by complaints about workload, support, and inflexibility.

, while online reviews range from highly positive to strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

64/100

because many students earned A grades through assignments and , but missed deadlines and exams can hurt badly.

Format shift

Online reviews mention unlimited attempts and extra credit but also strict deadlines; and harder exams.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

The workload is heavy, with , and reading across many reviews.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize Pearson homework and weekly tasks more strongly, while and quizzes as significant.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Teaching quality is mixed because and responsive for some students but feels hands-off or uncaring to others.

Format shift

Online reviews are more negative about self-teaching and support, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

68/100

Assessment , and finals, with exams carrying major importance.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the clearest assessment details, while , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are generally more balanced, describing difficult accounting material but reasonable structure, , and .

Main concern

The material and and .

What students said

“Material wasn't the easiest, but it's not and .”
ACCT1C
“The .”
ACCT1C

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with some praising organization, , and responsiveness while others complain about heavy work, self-teaching, and strict timelines.

Main concern

Students may need , and assignments.

What students said

“I basically had to .”
ACCOUNTING
“ and light workload!”
ACTG1C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam setup appears standard to somewhat demanding, with midterms and and quizzes but .

Two Exams Plus FinalWeekly QuizzesPearson HomeworkTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Harder ExamsHomework and Weekly Quizzes
“The .”
ACCT1C
“homework and exams.”
ACCT1C

Online

Online reviews clearly mention exams, finals, quizzes, and Pearson, but they do not clearly .

Two Exams Plus FinalWeekly QuizzesPearson HomeworkPractice Tests
“2 exams+1 final all MCQ.”
ACTG1C
“2 mids, 1 final, and 1 group project.”
ACCT1C

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I basically had to .”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment style. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“I basically had to .”

📚 Workload Pressure

32/100

“He gives a lot of work, often redundant.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

66/100

“Overall he is a solid choice.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and has lots of extra credits.
  • .
  • Not the most helpful and certainly not the most understanding teacher I've had.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You must read the book, read his lectures, do ALL of if you want an A.
  • Material wasn't the easiest, but it's not and .
  • The workload is actually heavy, so you need to understand the course well.

Theme 3

🧪

  • 2 exams+1 final all MCQ.
  • , and weekly homework.
  • The .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 21 reviews span a long period, include detailed evidence, and show consistent themes despite mixed opinions.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 57
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ACCT1C13 reviews
ACCOUNTING3 reviews
ACTG1C3 reviews
ACCT3011 review
F21ACTGF001C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 2 · A 10 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1