Is this an easy A?
HardWork
32/100An A is possible online, but , and unforgiving grading rather than an easy path.
Online evidence shows a lower-difficulty A-, while and worse outcomes.
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
An A is possible online, but comments point to poor support, few graded items, and unforgiving grading rather than an easy path.
Online evidence shows a lower-difficulty A-, while in-person evidence shows harsher grading and worse outcomes.
Is the course easy?
Python itself should be manageable, but students say the teaching made it confusing and unstructured.
Online content seems simpler and module-based, while in-person students report more confusion from lectures.
Is attendance flexible?
Reviews do not clearly prove a strict attendance policy.
Neither online nor in-person comments give clear attendance rules.
Is this professor recommended?
Students overwhelmingly advise against taking him because of disorganization, poor feedback, and weak communication.
Both formats are negative, with online focused on communication and in-person focused on teaching quality.
Course guide
Grading
Harsh
18/100
Students describe him as unforgiving, late with grades, and unwilling to allow missed points to be made up.
Format shift
In-person reviews provide the strongest evidence of harsh grading, while online evidence mainly shows delayed grading.
Workload
Moderate
46/100
The class includes weekly projects, homework, and exams, but the workload is not described as overwhelming by most reviews.
Format shift
Online work is described as reading and homework, while in-person work includes weekly projects and two exams.
Teaching experience
Awful
18/100
Reviews repeatedly describe confusing, disorganized teaching with little useful feedback.
Format shift
In-person reviews criticize lectures directly, while the online review says the course is mostly Canvas reading.
Assessment method
Balanced
55/100
Assessment appears to mix homework, weekly projects, and exams.
Format shift
In-person reviews mention weekly projects and two exams, while online evidence mentions homework submissions only.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
In-person reviews report confusing lectures, weak structure, little feedback, and unforgiving grading.
Main concern
Students felt lost because lectures and feedback were poor.
What students said
“He is not a good professor.”
“Lectures were disorganized, didn't like to give feedback on assignments.”
“Makes Python more confusing than it actually is, didn't really have a structured class.”
Remote format
Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
The online review describes a mostly self-taught Canvas course with poor communication and delayed grading.
Main concern
The professor does not answer emails or grade on time.
What students said
“The professor doesn't answer emails or grade on time, the entire class is just reading through modules on Canvas.”
Exam style
Reviews mention exams but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, or open-book rules.
Assessment risk
Varies
45/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person reviews mention two exams but do not clearly prove the exam format or rules.
“Weekly projects and 2 exams.”
The online review does not clearly prove any exam policy.
Student evidence
Top student voice
“If you want to feel lost and unprepared by the end of the quarter, take his class.”
“Makes Python more confusing than it actually is, didn't really have a structured class.”
“Does not allow you to make up points missed and is not a forgiving grader.”
“The professor doesn't answer emails or grade on time, the entire class is just reading through modules on Canvas.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
4
Recent reviews read by the AI
4
Lifetime ratings
62/100
Evidence confidence
Only four reviews are available, but they are recent, detailed, and highly consistent.
Inside 4 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
4 reported outcomes
A- 1
B+ 1
C 1
No reported values
F 1
No reported values