AI Rate Professor

Counseling

SuQiong Yu

CNSL5 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

if you need an easy counseling requirement and and limited usefulness.

Best fit · Easy A HunterVery easy courseHard to understandExcessive workCommon sense contentLimited usefulness
  • Students agree the course content is very easy and mostly common sense.
  • The main weakness is communication, with multiple students saying the instructor is hard to understand.
  • Workload may feel excessive for a short, low-credit counseling course.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

85/100

The content is described as very easy, and the only reported completed grade is an A despite complaints.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

90/100

Students describe the class as very easy, common sense, and harder only because of how it is taught.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person CNSL5 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

because it is not very useful and the instructor is hard to understand.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

The class appears grade-friendly because the course is very easy and the .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The work is not intellectually hard, but one student found it excessive for a short two-credit course.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Teaching is weakened by hard-to-understand communication and limited usefulness despite simple content.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mention work but do not mention exams, so .

Format shift

In-person comments do not provide detailed assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

but not very useful class where communication problems make simple material harder.

Main concern

Students may struggle to understand the instructor and may find the workload excessive for the credit value.

What students said

“The class wasn't bad, but not very useful.”
CNSL5
“Easy course but hard to understand.”
CNSL5

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, quizzes, midterms, or finals.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy course but hard to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in easiness, usefulness, and teaching clarity. Credibility rating: Low.

📘 Course Easiness

90/100

“Very easy class.”

🗣️ Teaching Clarity

45/100

“The teacher was very hard to understand (language barrier).”

👍 Recommendation Rate

32/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📘 About Difficulty

  • Very easy class.
  • Easy course but hard to understand.

Theme 2

🧭 About Usefulness

  • The class wasn't bad, but not very useful.
  • Week 3 is the only useful portion ( TAP, TAG, GE requirements, education plan).

Theme 3

🗣️ About Teaching Clarity

  • The teacher was very hard to understand (language barrier).
  • The work should not have been hard, but the way it was taught made it way harder than it should have been.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 reviews are available, and they are brief with limited detail beyond easiness and communication issues.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CNSL53 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2