AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Arthur Ardizzone

ACCT051A · ACTG51C · ACTG54 · ACTG51A · ACCT051A05B · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a rewarded and help is available.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear gradingResponsive professorExtra creditOpen book examsManageable accounting
  • Students , and supportive communication.
  • The and homework, but grading and and manageable.
  • Online evidence is strong and very positive, while the single in-person-coded review also describes an online-class experience positively.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

An A is realistic with steady homework and attempts, and occasional grade bumps.

Online reviews provide most of the easy-A evidence, while the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Accounting content takes work and reading, but students say the structure, practice tools, and .

Online reviews describe manageable but work-based difficulty, while trend.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews , and most evidence comes from online course structure rather than meeting requirements.

Online reviews imply flexible asynchronous work, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

because , and willing to correct mistakes.

Online reviews strongly support recommendation, and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Clear criteria, , multiple attempts, score corrections, and a grade bump show generous but .

Format shift

Online reviews provide most grading evidence, with the and exams.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Work is steady with weekly reading, homework, papers, and exams, but and manageable.

Format shift

Online reviews mention regular homework and reading, while the .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students repeatedly describe him as , and willing to fix course problems.

Format shift

Online reviews strongly support excellent teaching, and the .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment , and practice systems rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

Online reviews give detailed assessment structure, while the and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The and praises access, responsiveness, and .

Main concern

Confidence is limited because there is .

What students said

“ .”
ACTG51C
“Questions and .”
ACTG51C

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are strongly positive, emphasizing clear expectations, responsive help, , and manageable exams.

Main concern

The class , and accounting practice.

What students said

“ and feedback.”
ACTG54
“Two chapters a . Multiple attempts allowed.”
ACTG51A
“the tests were, if anything, almost too easy considering the material.”
ACTG51C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and student-friendly, with explicit online evidence of open-book testing, ample time, and no surprises.

Open bookMultiple attemptsPlenty of timeClear examsMidterms and final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The in-person-coded review says questions and , but it does not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or .

Clear exams
“Questions and .”
ACTG51C

Online

Online reviews explicitly support open-book exams, plenty of , and a final, but they do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring rules.

Open bookPlenty of timeNo surprisesTwo testsMidterm and final
“Plenty of time was allowed. It was open book. with no surprises.”
ACTG51A
“the tests were, if anything, almost too easy considering the material.”
ACTG51C
“ and a final”
ACCT051A05B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and feedback. Promptly responded to questions, and genuinely seemed to take interest in student's success in learning the material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Promptly responded to questions, and genuinely seemed to take interest in student's success in learning the material.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“ .”

⚖️

88/100

“I got an 88% in the class but he bumped me up.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and feedback.
  • He answered emails the and was encouraging.
  • .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • reviews, two midterms and a final
  • Two chapters a . Multiple attempts allowed.
  • Must do the reading. Even more important to do the problems and then some !

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • Plenty of time was allowed. It was open book. with no surprises.
  • the tests were, if anything, almost too easy considering the material.
  • Made a mistake on 1st mid-term, presenting a and hard, but he went out of his way to correct the error

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen detailed reviews across many years are highly consistent, though .

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 58
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACTG51A6 reviews
ACCT051A3 reviews
ACTG51C3 reviews
ACTG542 reviews
ACCT051A05B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

10

A 8 · A- 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values