AI Rate Professor

Speech

Natalie Kellner

COMM1 · COMM2 · COMM1A · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
38.89%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you mainly want a manageable grade and , and unclear guidance.

Best fit · Easy A HunterDisorganizedEasy ASlow GradingHeavy BusyworkUnclear Instructions
  • Grades are often easy, but students repeatedly report poor organization and .
  • Online reviews dominate the evidence and show major issues with , and .
  • A few students found her kind and lenient, but the negative experience pattern is stronger.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A is often easy if assignments are completed, but grading delays, busywork, and .

Online evidence strongly supports an easy A with poor organization, while and less grade-friendly.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course content is usually basic communication work, but unclear instructions and itself.

Online students call the class easy but disorganized, while and unclear requirements.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Participation and assignment completion matter, but the reviews do .

Online reviews emphasize completion and participation, while in-person reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Most students do not recommend her because poor organization, late grading, and .

Online reviews include some strong positive easy-A experiences, but both formats contain serious warnings about organization and feedback.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Many students earned A grades and several say credit is given for completed work, though some report harsh speech grading.

Format shift

Online grading is often described as completion-based, while .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students repeatedly , and last-minute assignment loads.

Format shift

Online reviews report heavier busywork and late-posted assignments, while and mixed.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Students frequently describe her as , and unclear despite a few positive comments about kindness and feedback.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews also report disorganization and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades appear driven , and written assignments rather than major exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly assignments and speeches most often, while and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, , and poor organization.

Main concern

Students report and difficult or .

What students said

“Ms. Kellner is a nightmare of disorganization.”
COMM1A
“She has difficult and tricky quizzes.”
COMM1A
“The work load wasn't too bad.”
COMM2

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online students often describe the class as easy to pass but , and heavy with busywork.

Main concern

, and changing or incorrect due dates are the main problems.

What students said

“Everything is copy & paste from other quarters, due dates and instructions are wrong.”
COMM1A
“Kellner's class was a joke. Yes, it was super easy but I learned nothing and felt it was a waste of time.”
COMM1A
“Class is an easy A as long as you don't make glaring mistakes in speeches or miss assignments.”
COMM1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and speech assignments, but they do not clearly prove a .

QuizzesSpeechesWritten AssignmentsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and short essays, but do not clearly prove exam format, book policy, or proctoring rules.

QuizzesShort EssaysNo Clear Exam Policy
“ , as she gives you two chances and answers after the first attempt so you can get 100% on the second try.”
COMM2
“She has difficult and tricky quizzes.”
COMM1A

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, discussions, written prep, and live or filmed speeches, but do not clearly prove webcam proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book exams, or a .

QuizzesLive SpeechesFilmed SpeechesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Just 2 zoom meetings for major speeches.”
COMM1A
“There were two live-presentation speeches (5min each, peers have to video call in), and a few short filmed ones.”
COMM1A
“So many quizzes which have some decent questions but .”
COMM1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Kellner's class was a joke. Yes, it was super easy but I learned nothing and felt it was a waste of time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and organization; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“She is super disorganized (and this was before COVID) and would post modules late, used old videos from past classes .”

📈 Easy Grade

78/100

“Class is an easy A as long as you don't make glaring mistakes in speeches or miss assignments.”

⚖️

70/100

“She seemed to give credit as long as the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She gives good feedbacks too.
  • Prof. Kellner gives very unclear instructions with conflicting instructions.
  • and adds requirements to the course, telling students to drop if they don't like them.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Had her for summer which is an online class and it is so easy to get A/A+ as long as you finished the assignment.
  • The work load wasn't too bad.
  • She graded our speech very harshly.

Theme 3

🧭 About Organization

  • Everything is copy & paste from other quarters, due dates and instructions are wrong.
  • Ms. Kellner is a nightmare of disorganization.
  • Way too much busy work and too little learning.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 18 reviews across online and , workload, and organization.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 58

Course coverage

COMM1A13 reviews
COMM24 reviews
COMM11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 2 · A 8

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 5