AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Olga Van Hulsen

ACTG067 · ACTG65 · ACTGF067 · ACTG67 · F067 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

unless you can teach yourself accounting with and heavy workload.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-taught courseSlow responsesHeavy homeworkTest heavyTough grading
  • Students repeatedly say the .
  • Workload is heavy, with , and reading.
  • Exams and finals are described as and high-risk for grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears possible but requires heavy independent study, careful reading, and .

Online evidence is mostly about self-teaching and project/final risk, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Tax and accounting content is described as , and poorly supported by outdated or mismatched materials.

Both formats describe difficult content, but online students report more severe lack of instruction.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews mention participation matters but do .

Online and in-person reviews mention participation, but neither format clearly establishes an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Most because support is weak and the class feels self-taught.

Both formats are negative, with online reviews showing the strongest avoidance warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students report , and .

Format shift

Online comments mention tough grading and high-stakes finals, while match preparation.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and tax forms.

Format shift

Both formats show heavy workload, with online reviews adding major end-of-course projects.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students repeatedly describe , and limited help.

Format shift

Online reviews are harsher about ghosting and self-teaching, while and .

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

, and a comprehensive final.

Format shift

Online reviews mention projects, quizzes, homework, and finals, while , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews also , and unclear expectations.

Main concern

as much harder than the preparation materials.

What students said

“ quizzes.”
ACTG67
“The ppt material is outdated.”
ACTG067

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, with students reporting self-teaching, unanswered questions, heavy work, and .

Main concern

Students often felt abandoned when they needed help.

What students said

“AVOID! Class was entirely self taught and once you get to the project towards the end, you were on your .”
ACTG65
“No teaching whatsoever so be prepared to figure everything out .”
ACTG65
“This has been my hardest online class.”
ACTG67

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules, but exams and as hard and grade-threatening.

Weekly QuizzesHard ExamsComprehensive FinalTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as and quizzes, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring policy.

Hard ExamsTest Heavy
“ quizzes.”
ACTG67
“Even though I Aced the quiz, got 100% on the , barely passed.”
ACTG067

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes and a , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Weekly QuizzesComprehensive FinalTest Heavy
“ and .”
F067
“ and worth so if don't pass it, u will fail class”
F067

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“AVOID! Class was entirely self taught and once you get to the project towards the end, you were on your .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“No teaching whatsoever so be prepared to figure everything out .”

👍 Recommendation Risk

15/100

“Overall, this class was okay but .”

📚 Workload Pressure

20/100

“I did put "a lot of because there IS a lot of homework.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Support

  • questions regarding the material in the class.
  • Many questions in the inbox went unanswered for days.
  • Takes a while for professor to answer question.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • This has been my hardest online class.
  • quizzes.
  • and worth so if don't pass it, u will fail class

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • There were many un-updated things in this class where the old material that did not match up with the textbook.
  • The material itself was hard, the hw required a lot of .
  • The class is tough and requires reading and doing quiet a few tax forms but it was SO VERY USEFUL!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews across several years show consistent complaints about workload, responsiveness, and .

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ACTG0672 reviews
ACTG652 reviews
ACTG672 reviews
ACTGF0671 review
F0671 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2