AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Tony Kashani

HUMN7 · HUMN8 · HUMN7H · HUM8 · HUMN6 · HUMN07H · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
98/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
84%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Kashani is a strong pick for students who want a meaningful but low-stress humanities course with .

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy AInspirational lecturesGood feedbackMinimal examsRespected expert
  • Students overwhelmingly recommend Kashani for engaging humanities content and strong expertise.
  • The course is usually an easy A if , and deadlines.
  • Online reviews are mostly positive but include some complaints about podcasts, YouTube content, and vague instructions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

Getting an A is very easy for students , and assignments on time.

Online and comments especially direct about minimal weekly work and easy A outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

The course , and assignments are mostly discussions and short papers.

Online reviews stress low workload and async simplicity, while and essay requirements.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

Most evidence points to asynchronous or participation-based .

Online reviews clearly mention asynchronous work, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students strongly recommend him because he is knowledgeable, fair, inspirational, and easy to succeed with.

, though online reviews include a few more complaints about videos and clarity.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

95/100

because many students report easy A , and high scores for completed work.

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly call it an easy A, while to an A for sure.

Workload

Light

86/100

Workload is light to moderate, usually , and limited reading or videos.

Format shift

Online workload is often described as very light, while and discussion tasks.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Teaching experience is excellent because most , and discussion quality.

Format shift

Both formats praise his expertise, though online students more often criticize the style of assigned videos or podcasts.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment is mostly assignment-based, with discussions, essays, reflection papers, projects, and little emphasis on exams.

Format shift

Online evidence strongly favors assignments over exams, while , and a slideshow or final essay.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students generally , and engaging discussions while still finding the grade manageable.

Main concern

One in-person review says the class was boring despite the easy grade.

What students said

“If you do what is asked, you will get an A for sure!”
HUMN7H
“Dr. Kashani is a first rate expert in interdisciplinary studies.”
HUMN8

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online students usually describe an easy asynchronous course with , and strong learning value.

Main concern

A few online students find the videos, podcasts, or instructions unclear or .

What students said

“ your IGETC requirements!”
HUMN8
“He is all about knowledge and not about testing and exams.”
HUMN6

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam structure is student-friendly because reviews emphasize assignments, essays, and .

Few ExamsDiscussion BasedEssay BasedFinal Essay

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

91/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

slideshow, and a final essay, but do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Discussion PostsEssaysMidterm SlideshowFinal Essay
“Discussion post once a week, 3 essay, 1 Midterm slide show, and .”
HUMN7H
“He is the best!”
HUMN07H

Online

Online reviews mention papers, discussions, projects, and a final, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or .

Async AssignmentsDiscussionsPapersLow Testing Emphasis
“He is all about knowledge and not about testing and exams.”
HUMN6
“two papers and a .”
HUMN7

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ your IGETC requirements!”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“I am a UC student and had professor Kashani for a summer course at FH. He is by far a more knowledgeable professor than most of the UC professors.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

91/100

“ , as he is brilliant!”

📈 Easy A

94/100

“All you gotta do is complete a total of like four short essays and participate in a and easy A as long as you just do the minimum.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dr. Kashani is a true visionary.
  • Dr. Kashani is a first rate expert in interdisciplinary studies.
  • He was inspirational.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • What an easy class. and a .
  • I took Kashani for Humanities 6 and got an A easily, but I have to say it was an amazing learning experience.
  • If you do what is asked, you will get an A for sure!

Theme 3

💻 About Online Class

  • This was online asynchronous and took max like 2 hours a week.
  • Easy assignments.
  • Dropped. Want an enriching Honors-level class? Go elsewhere.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 25 recent reviews across online and and consistent positive pattern.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HUMN812 reviews
HUMN64 reviews
HUMN7H3 reviews
HUM82 reviews
HUMN07H2 reviews
Show 1 more courses
HUMN72 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 3 · A 10

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values