AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Wesley Chun

CS21B · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

if you can handle a very difficult, high-stakes class with a polarizing instructor.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizingVery DifficultPop QuizzesInconsistent CriteriaArrogant Tone
  • The two reviews are sharply split between praise and a severe complaint about classroom behavior.
  • Both reviews report high difficulty, even though both students earned A-range grades.
  • The main risk is inconsistent standards and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

A-range grades are possible, but both reviews rate the class extremely difficult and one warns it is graded by few things.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

The course appears intellectually demanding, with both students rating difficulty at the maximum level.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, though pop quizzes may reduce flexibility.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation is mixed because one review is enthusiastic while the other describes serious classroom and .

The , and there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, and changing criteria make grading feel strict despite A-range outcomes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload is not described in detail, but maximum difficulty and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

, but the detailed negative review describes arrogance, inconsistency, and public criticism.

Format shift

All and is sharply conflicting.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tags mention pop quizzes and being graded by few things, suggesting high-stakes assessments.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

him amazing and another criticizing arrogance and shifting criteria.

Main concern

Inconsistent expectations and very high difficulty.

What students said

“Amazing professor”
CS21B
“Doesn't help he changes his criteria everyday.”
CS21B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention pop quizzes and , but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Pop QuizzesFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and few graded items but do not clearly prove exam format or .

Pop QuizzesFew Graded Items
“Beware of pop quizzes”
CS21B
“Graded by few things”
CS21B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Doesn't help he changes his criteria everyday.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“Amazing professor”

⚠️ Classroom Risk

28/100

“Yet he is quick to point out other people's errors, in full view of class.”

📈 Difficulty

35/100

“Doesn't help he changes his criteria everyday.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing professor
  • In two words? Arrogant. Inconsistent/hypocritical.

Theme 2

⚖️ And Standards

  • Graded by few things
  • Doesn't help he changes his criteria everyday.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

, and they are highly polarized across a long time span.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CS21B2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values