AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Farima Fakoor

ACTG066 · ACCTG1A · F053 · AC53 · ACTG51AAND66 · ACCT066 · ACCT001 · ACCTG66 · ACCT66 · ACCT1C · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
84.62%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

She is a solid choice for examples, and a caring instructor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring ProfessorOrganized CourseFair GradingReal-World ExamplesMixed Older Reviews
  • Recent online reviews are strongly positive, , and real-world examples.
  • Older reviews are more mixed, with complaints about communication, self-teaching, and course design.
  • Accounting material is not easy, but students who keep up usually see the workload as fair.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Good grades are common when students keep up with reading, weekly work, and assignments, but the course is not a free A.

and high grades, while in-person reviews add more self-teaching and workload concerns.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The accounting content is described as hard or work-heavy, but organization and examples make it manageable.

Online reviews present the material as clearer, while in-person reviews are more mixed .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Participation matters in several reviews, but .

Online evidence mentions participation, while in-person evidence focuses more on weekly postings and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

because , and professionally useful.

Online recommendation is very strong in recent reviews, while but includes older negative outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Students often call grading fair, though a and .

Format shift

Online reviews , while in-person reviews are less consistent.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload , and sometimes a paper, but many students find it manageable.

Format shift

Online workload is described as organized, while .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Recent reviews describe her as , and practical, despite older complaints about communication.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is strongest and most positive, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

The course uses weekly assignments, postings, quizzes, a , and sometimes a paper.

Format shift

, while online reviews mention activities and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and help balanced by older complaints about self-teaching, communication, and busywork.

Main concern

Some in-person-labeled reviews complain that students must teach themselves from the textbook.

What students said

“ .”
ACCT066
“I know the and organized so I can progress at my own pace ahead of deadlines.”
ACTG51AAND66
“Students are expected to teach themselves from the textbook.”
ACTG066

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive and describe her as caring, organized, fair, and and anti-cheating software.

Main concern

The and anti-cheating software in a small set of negative reviews.

What students said

“ . Examples of real world situations.”
AC53
“ . It is super easy to follow the course and know what is going on.”
ACTG066
“All of a sudden she emailed us to tell us to use this anti-cheating program very odd.”
F053

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam policy appears mixed because , and one online anti-cheating program complaint.

Final ExamQuizzesMidtermAnti-Cheating ProgramDifferent Final Questions

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring policy.

QuizzesMidtermFinal
“2 quizzes of about 10q's which were mostly vocabulary, 1 midterm, 1 final of about 35 Qs similar to quiz format”
ACCT066
“Exams and .”
ACTG066

Online

Online reviews mention a final with different question sets and one anti-cheating program, but do .

Final ExamDifferent Question SetsAnti-Cheating Program
“Saying she would give us all different questions for the good teaching?”
AC53
“All of a sudden she emailed us to tell us to use this anti-cheating program very odd.”
F053

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This has been one of the better classes I have taken at Foothill. I can tell the professor actually cares and invests her time in helping the students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ . It is super easy to follow the course and know what is going on.”

⚖️

68/100

“ . Excellent caring teacher.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Farima is one of the .
  • and makes sure her students are all doing well.
  • Students are expected to teach themselves from the textbook.

Theme 2

📊 About Organization & Work

  • The class activities provided by the teacher .
  • .
  • Lot of work manageable if you're pro-active.

Theme 3

🧾

  • . Examples of real world situations.
  • Seems really unfair, some people might get easier /harder questions depending on the problem sets
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 24 reviews include both recent detailed praise and older detailed criticism across formats.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ACCT0665 reviews
AC534 reviews
ACCT664 reviews
ACTG0664 reviews
F0532 reviews
Show 5 more courses
ACCT0011 review
ACCT1C1 review
ACCTG1A1 review
ACCTG661 review
ACTG51AAND661 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 5 · A- 2

B range

5

B+ 5

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values