AI Rate Professor

Graphic Design

Kate Jordahl

GID60 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you are comfortable with heavy writing and minimal direct instruction.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy writingLow teaching presenceOld videosNot worth credits
  • The only review says the online course has far more writing than expected for two units.
  • The student reports learning very little and says the instructor rarely teaches directly.
  • There is no evidence of .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

The review gives no grade proof and describes frequent essays and lengthy writing, so an A likely requires more effort than expected.

Evidence comes only from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The content may not be intellectually deep, but the heavy writing and poor teaching make the course feel difficult.

Only the online section has evidence, and it is strongly negative.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

and absent for in-person classes.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

The only student review is negative because the class is writing-heavy and the instructor rarely teaches.

Recommendation evidence comes only from one online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

There is , but the heavy writing suggests grades are not effortless.

Format shift

Only one online review exists, and it .

Workload

Heavy

20/100

The student says the course has frequent essays and lengthy paragraphs despite being only two units.

Format shift

The heavy workload concern comes entirely from the online review.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

The student says the instructor relies on old videos and hardly teaches the class herself.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

The review only mentions essays and lengthy written responses, with .

Format shift

Assessment evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review describes heavy writing, old video content, and very little direct teaching.

Main concern

Workload feels much heavier than the unit value suggests.

What students said

“This class is far from being worth 2 units there is so much writing involved.”
GID60
“She hardly ever teaches the class herself.”
GID60

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review does .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She hardly ever teaches the class herself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“She hardly ever teaches the class herself.”

📚 Workload

20/100

“This class is far from being worth 2 units there is so much writing involved.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

20/100

“ and lengthy paragraphs of what we've learned (which is nothing!)”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She hardly ever teaches the class herself.
  • We only watch old videos of interviews with guest speakers.

Theme 2

📝 About Workload

  • This class is far from being worth 2 units there is so much writing involved.
  • and lengthy paragraphs of what we've learned (which is nothing!)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

, so the evidence is detailed but too limited for strong confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

GID601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values