AI Rate Professor

Biology

Lissa Derugin

BIOL10 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want an engaging biology class and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate teacherFun labsStrict grading detailsEnjoyable classDedicated
  • Students describe Lissa Derugin as passionate, dedicated, funny, and enjoyable.
  • as fun, interesting, and not too hard.
  • The main caution is strict, detail-focused grading despite both students reporting A grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Both reviewers earned A grades and labs are not too hard, but .

Online and in-person evidence match closely, with and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

63/100

Labs are described as fun and not very hard, though .

Both formats describe BIOL10 labs as enjoyable and manageable.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Reviews , but one tag says skipping class may hurt performance.

The online review includes the attendance-related tag, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

because she is passionate, dedicated, enjoyable, and helps students learn.

Online and in-person reviews are both positive despite the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Both and close attention to details.

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews give the same .

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Labs are described as fun and not too hard, with no strong evidence of overwhelming workload.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students describe her as passionate, dedicated, funny, and enjoyable while saying they learned a lot.

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews are consistently positive about teaching quality.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

The available evidence centers on labs and .

Format shift

Both formats mention labs, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The in-person review is positive, highlighting , and .

Main concern

The and attention to details.

What students said

“ and fun.”
BIOL10
“ and pays close attention to details.”
BIOL10

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The online review is very positive, praising passion, fun labs, and learning value while .

Main concern

The main .

What students said

“The .”
BIOL10
“she is somewhat of a and very particular to details.”
BIOL10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Amazing professor! Extremely passionate and dedicated. and interesting.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, labs, and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Amazing professor! Extremely passionate and dedicated.”

⚖️

34/100

“she is somewhat of a and very particular to details.”

🔬 Lab Experience

80/100

“ and fun.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great professor, good personality to match as well.
  • Amazing professor! Extremely passionate and dedicated.

Theme 2

🔬 About Labs

  • and fun.
  • The .

Theme 3

⚖️

  • and pays close attention to details.
  • she is somewhat of a and very particular to details.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, so the pattern is useful but not broad enough for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BIOL102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values