AI Rate Professor

Horticulture

Dan Svenson

HORTICULTURE · HORT · ALLOFEM · DESIGNTHEORY · HORT84 · HORT80 · HORTA · AAA · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Dan Svenson is worth taking for motivated students who value expertise and can handle an .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerKnowledgeableHelpful outside classMixed lecture clarityHigh standardsAttendance matters
  • Students often praise his knowledge and real field expertise.
  • Teaching clarity is mixed, with several students calling lectures dull or .
  • Success depends on attending consistently and keeping up with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

61/100

Grades are not well documented, but comments suggest students can succeed if they attend, keep up, and .

Online evidence suggests a lighter path, while and project discipline.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The material is technical and sometimes , though not impossible for .

The single online review sounds easier, while and missed-class risk.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

because students say missing class makes lectures and .

In-person reviews drive this score, while the single online review .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

, and learning value, despite mixed clarity and workload complaints.

The online review is very positive, while but still show strong learning value.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Comments point to high standards but do not show harsh or .

Format shift

In-person reviews mention high standards, while the single online review .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Workload ranges from relatively light online to hard and .

Format shift

Online evidence says light workload, while and projects.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

He is widely seen as knowledgeable and helpful, but several students criticize dull lectures and .

Format shift

Online evidence is strongly positive, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and class work more than exams.

Format shift

, while the online review gives little detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

many praise his knowledge, but .

Main concern

Students who miss class or .

What students said

“Dan is very knowledgeable in his field and is a valuable asset to the program.”
HORT
“Knows his stuff but has difficulty getting concepts across to students in a and easy way.”
HORT

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The one online review is strongly positive, citing engaging lectures, light workload, and .

Main concern

The online evidence is limited to one review.

What students said

“Prof. Svenson gives engaging lectures and a relatively light workload for the subject.”
HORT80
“he always reponded to my emails promptly.”
HORT80

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book policy, or final structure.

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dan is very knowledgeable in his field and is a valuable asset to the program.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, clarity, and learning value. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Knows his stuff but has difficulty getting concepts across to students in a and easy way.”

👍 Recommendation Value

76/100

“ .”

📚 Workload And Attendance

52/100

“if you miss a class you miss a lot.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The material is technical and he is mechanical in delivery.
  • His lectures are very dull and he tends to go off on tangents totally off topic.
  • Prof. Svenson gives engaging lectures and a relatively light workload for the subject.

Theme 2

🧠 About Knowledge And Skill

  • Dan is very knowledgeable in his field and is a valuable asset to the program.
  • He is very knowledgable.
  • His technical skills are sharp and his standards for excellance are very high.

Theme 3

📈 About Effort And Success

  • if you miss a class you miss a lot.
  • The classes are not that difficult if you can stay on top of the homework.
  • If you procrastinate on the homework and !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews provide useful consistency on expertise and clarity issues, but many are old and several lack grade details.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HORT4 reviews
HORT802 reviews
AAA1 review
ALLOFEM1 review
DESIGNTHEORY1 review
Show 3 more courses
HORT841 review
HORTA1 review
HORTICULTURE1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not_Sure_Yet 2