AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Leticia Serna

CNSLF005 · CLS50 · CSNL50 · COUNSELINGAPPT · CNS1 · CNSL53 · CNSL50 · CNSL · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless you only need an easy, low-stakes class and can tolerate inconsistent help.

Best fit · Easy A HunterRude counseling reportsMixed helpfulnessEasy courseworkPoor online responseCondescending tone
  • Recent counseling reviews are strongly negative, especially about rudeness and rushed or inaccurate advice.
  • Coursework can be very easy when the class is structured well, but support is inconsistent.
  • Online evidence is limited but and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Class-based reviews describe very easy material and self-paced work, but counseling reviews do not support an easy academic experience.

Online evidence is too limited and negative, while .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The coursework is described as very easy and beginner-friendly when focused on CNSL classes rather than counseling appointments.

The online review reports unclear modules, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly establish an , though one in-person class allowed self-paced work.

Online and evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Students split sharply, but the strongest and most recent comments warn against her because of rude counseling and poor guidance.

The only online review is negative, and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Some students report easy grades, but one online review mentions zeros for and no response.

Format shift

In-person class reviews sound lenient, while the single online review suggests grading can feel .

Workload

Light

78/100

Several course reviews , and automatic-pass difficulty.

Format shift

, but the online review says instructions were unclear.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Helpful class reviews are outweighed by repeated reports of rude, condescending, and inaccurate counseling.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is limited and negative, while but recently very negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Reviews mention coursework, modules, assignments, and counseling activities rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point to assignment or activity-based work, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

and helpful class experiences but many serious complaints about counseling tone and accuracy.

Main concern

Many students describe her as rude, condescending, rushed, or unhelpful.

What students said

“Very rude and condescending”
CNS1
“Super easy A, she provides help upon request but it's very easy material.”
CNSLF005
“She is absolutely the academic career.”
COUNSELINGAPPT

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online , and missing instructions.

Main concern

Online communication appears poor based on the only online review.

What students said

“none of them ever got responded to”
CNSL
“The and modules missing instructions.”
CNSL

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam .

No Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews focus on counseling, coursework, and ease, but reviews do .

No Clear Exam Evidence
“it's very easy material”
CNSLF005
“it should be an automatic pass.”
CNSL50

Online

The online review mentions assignments and , but reviews do .

No Clear Exam Evidence
“The and modules missing instructions.”
CNSL

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very rude and condescending, if you suffer from anxiety I definitely recommend going with a different counselor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in counseling tone, coursework, and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“She guides us through.”

⚠️ Counseling Risk

30/100

“She will try to rush you through your appointment and then forget to tell you that there are other things that you must do.”

📈 Course Ease

78/100

“Super easy A, she provides help upon request but it's very easy material.”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Counseling Tone

  • Very rude and condescending
  • Horrible, horrible counselor.
  • Snotty, condescending and just plain rude.

Theme 2

📚 About Coursework

  • Super easy A, she provides help upon request but it's very easy material.
  • felt like self paced class.
  • The and modules missing instructions.

Theme 3

❤️

  • and .
  • Fun teacher, and really made the class enjoyable.
  • Shes even willing to help you out when you don't even have an appt with her!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews give useful but mixed evidence, with a long time span and only one online review.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

CNS15 reviews
CNSL504 reviews
CNSL2 reviews
CLS501 review
CNSL531 review
Show 3 more courses
CNSLF0051 review
COUNSELINGAPPT1 review
CSNL501 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 2 · Incomplete 1