AI Rate Professor

Foothill College · English

Teresa Hansen

ENGL1B · ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENG110 · ENGLISH1A · 1A · ENGL100 · ENG1B · ENGL209 · ENGLI1A · ENG209 · ENGL110 · ENG100 · 47 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you can handle a , and inconsistent organization.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy writing workloadTough gradingSlow feedbackCaring but inconsistentFrequent absences
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who found her caring and students who found the class stressful and disorganized.
  • The main recurring problems are heavy reading and , and absences.
  • Older positive reviews soften the picture, but recent detailed reviews are strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students got A grades by doing all the work, but the , and delayed feedback make the A costly.

The online review is much harsher, while very stressful grading experiences.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content itself is not always hard, but the volume of essays, journals, reading, and .

, while in-person evidence is mixed but still workload-heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

because students mention both frequent instructor absences and attendance-related frustration.

, while the single online review does not prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recent and detailed reviews warn against the course because of , and disorganization.

The lone online review is strongly negative, and in-person reviews are split but contain many severe warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Many students call her a and say made improvement difficult.

Format shift

Both online and review especially negative.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and stressful pacing.

Format shift

The online review describes nonstop work, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

48/100

She is often described as caring and interesting, but repeated complaints about absences, organization, , and .

Format shift

Online feedback is very negative, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment appears , and papers rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with many older students praising her kindness but , and .

Main concern

Students often felt the workload and .

What students said

“Absurd amount of work and she doesn't grade based on the work, it's more on her opinion.”
ENG1B
“There are a total of 8 papers in this class and she only graded 3 before the final.”
ENG1B
“She was absent around 7 days during the quarter.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review is strongly negative and , and .

Main concern

The online workload was described as stressful with no time to recover.

What students said

“Zero days off, it is the most stressful class I have ever taken”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essays, papers, journals, and feedback, so the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly ProvedWriting-Heavy AssessmentFinal Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove a consistent exam format or proctoring policy.

Final MentionedWriting-Heavy Assessment
“ .”
ENGL1B
“There are a total of 8 papers in this class and she only graded 3 before the final.”
ENG1B

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proved

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There are a total of 8 papers in this class and she only graded 3 before the final.”

Voice snapshots generated from 47 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and personality. Credibility rating: High.

📝 Workload Pressure

18/100

“She gives so .”

⚖️

28/100

“She is also an .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“ and nice so attitude is not an issue, I didn't learn a thing or two but is a easy class if not important to you.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Absurd amount of work and she doesn't grade based on the work, it's more on her opinion.
  • There are a lot of essays and she is a .
  • but gives out a ridiculous amount of work.

Theme 2

⏱️ and Organization

  • She only graded some of them by the so you had no idea if you were improving or not.
  • She always absent from class for some ridicoulous reasons.
  • She takes a , but it is very easy to get an A.

Theme 3

❤️ About Personality

  • Tess is a wonderful teacher! She is so funny and caring and very understanding.
  • and pretty chill.
  • I love her! and normally I am shy to ask questions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

47

Recent reviews read by the AI

47

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 47 reviews cover many years and include detailed, recurring patterns, though older reviews conflict with recent ones.

Inside 47 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 515
3 out of 54
2 out of 55
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ENGL1A13 reviews
ENG1A11 reviews
ENG1104 reviews
ENG1B4 reviews
ENGLISH1A3 reviews
Show 8 more courses
ENG1002 reviews
ENG2092 reviews
ENGL1102 reviews
ENGL1B2 reviews
1A1 review
ENGL1001 review
ENGL2091 review
ENGLI1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values