AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Anan Sturgess

ACTG76 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you can teach yourself from publisher materials.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRude communicationPoor course designMinimal teaching
  • The only review describes rude communication and weak support.
  • Assignments are described as poorly designed with .
  • The online course appears heavily textbook-driven with little original teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

Getting an A looks difficult because the and support is weak.

Evidence comes only from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content itself is not described as advanced, but poor design and weak teaching make it harder to manage.

Evidence comes only from one online review, with no in-person comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only student calls the class very disappointing and gives the lowest quality rating.

The recommendation evidence is entirely online, with no in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

because .

Format shift

Only the , and there is no in-person evidence.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload is unclear, but the class , and quizzes.

Format shift

Only online workload evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Awful

5/100

The review describes rude communication and very little real teaching.

Format shift

The teaching evidence comes from one online review only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The review mentions assignments and quizzes but .

Format shift

Only online assessment evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is strongly , and little teaching.

Main concern

Students may receive little guidance and .

What students said

“She is rude in her communication with students, has ”
ACTG76

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, open-book rules, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very disappointing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

5/100

“does very little teaching other than making students read the textbook and posting PowerPoints and quizzes”

⚖️

20/100

“ ”

👍 Recommendation Risk

5/100

“Very disappointing.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • does very little teaching other than making students read the textbook
  • She is rude in her communication with students

Theme 2

📋 About Course Design

  • posting PowerPoints and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review from one online course.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACTG761 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values