AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Anna Sturgess

ACTG76 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take Sturgess if and writing for fair grading, but if you dislike self-directed online work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFair gradingHeavy readingWeekly writingSelf-learning onlineHelpful feedback
  • Online reviews are mixed but and .
  • The course is reading-heavy with , and writing tasks.
  • Students who can self-study tend to do better than those needing lectures or study guides.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic with steady weekly work because , but the workload is not effortless.

Online evidence shows doable A outcomes with fair grading, while in person and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The material is not conceptually brutal, but ethics readings, writing, and .

Online reviews emphasize self-learning and reading, while in and writing demands.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Participation and weekly discussions matter, but the reviews do not prove a .

Online , while in person evidence mentions participation but not a .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and feedback, but several warn against the reading-heavy self-learning format.

Online reviews are polarized, while in person reviews include both a and a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students repeatedly describe fair or and weekly work is completed.

Format shift

Online reviews praise fair grading, while in person .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

The course has weekly discussions, multiple homework sets, reading, writing, group projects, and exams.

Format shift

Online reviews report lots of homework and group writing, while in person reviews stress weekly writing and dry reading.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

, and responsiveness, but some say the class depends too much on self-learning.

Format shift

Online reviews provide most teaching evidence, while in person evidence is limited and more mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment combines weekly homework, discussions, writing or group projects, midterms, and a final.

Format shift

Online evidence clearly mentions homework, discussions, projects, midterm, and final, while in person , and short-answer exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person evidence is mixed because one review reports uncomfortable online proctoring while .

Main concern

The , and one reported uncomfortable proctoring setup.

What students said

“The .”
ACTG76
“TONS of dry reading.”
ACTG76
“ as long as you put some thought into your answers.”
ACTG76

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe fair grading and but also a self-learning structure with , and group writing.

Main concern

The main concern is a lot of , and group work without study guides.

What students said

“Everything was doable even while I was working full time.”
ACTG76
“This is really self-learning class because she .”
ACTG76
“Sturgess assigns a lot of hw and reading, and doesnt provide study guides for .”
ACTG76

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

review citing online proctoring and several online reviews describing fair exams based on homework or reading.

Online Proctoring SoftwarePast Homework MCQShort Answer ExamsMidterm And Final

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews include one explicit report of online proctoring software and older evidence of MCQ midterms or short-answer exams.

Online Proctoring SoftwareMCQ MidtermsShort Answer Exams
“The .”
ACTG76
“Expect weekly writing assignments (up to 300 words) and .”
ACTG76
“ .”
ACTG76

Online

Online reviews describe midterm and as fair, with short answer, multiple choice, or past homework MCQ, but .

Past Homework MCQShort Answer QuestionsMultiple Choice QuestionsMidterm And Final
“ and .”
ACTG76
“Midterm and but it is not too hard as long as you read textbook.”
ACTG76
“The and involve short answer and sometimes a few multiple choices.”
ACTG76

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Everything was doable even while I was working full time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“She grades fairly and tells you how you can improve with .”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“Sturgess assigns a lot of hw and reading, and doesnt provide study guides for .”

⚖️

72/100

“ as long as you put some thought into your answers.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Super friendly and quick about response.
  • Great online teacher.
  • This is really self-learning class because she .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Expect weekly discussion posts, mcq homework, and .
  • TONS of dry reading.
  • This teacher assigns a lot of .

Theme 3

📝 About Exams And Grades

  • and .
  • The and involve short answer and sometimes a few multiple choices.
  • The .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across many years give useful patterns, but the evidence is older in places and split by format and tone.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACTG769 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1