AI Rate Professor

Foothill College · English As A Second Language

Lisa Collato

ENG1A · ENGL1A · ESL · ESLL25 · ESL25 · ESLL025 · ESLL26 · COS126 · ESLL237 · ESL26 · ELLS25 · ESL249 · ESL165 · ESLL249 · 44 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
76.19%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a supportive ESL or writing teacher and , and group work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring feedbackLots of homeworkGroup discussionsClear gradingStrong ESL support
  • Most students praise her as , and effective at improving writing.
  • The class often has lots of , and group discussion, which some students dislike.
  • Grades are generally fair and sometimes generous, but an A usually requires steady effort rather than just showing up.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students get good grades, but repeated comments say the A , and revision work.

The one online review supports passing with homework, while requires steady writing effort.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Her explanations and , but the , and discussions can still feel demanding.

Online evidence is too limited, while workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance appears important because discussions, participation, and in-class essays matter, though .

The , while in-person comments emphasize participation and class discussion.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

and writing improvement, despite concerns about homework and group work.

Both formats are positive, but the recommendation score is driven mainly by the large in-person review set.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

66/100

Grading is usually described as clear and fair, with and full credit on simpler assignments, but .

Format shift

The online review does not discuss grading details, while but .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Many students mention lots of , and group discussions, even when they say the work is useful.

Format shift

The online review mentions homework generally, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Most students describe her as , and strong at giving feedback on writing.

Format shift

The single online review is positive, and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment , and writing practice, with only limited exam evidence.

Format shift

and assignments in detail, while the online review gives little assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews and , but many warn about homework, essays, reading, and group discussions.

Main concern

Students who dislike group work or heavy writing practice may find the class frustrating.

What students said

“There were lots of but they were fairly simple”
ENGL1A
“Tons of homework but ”
ESLL26
“Hating long time of group discussions.”
ESLL025

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review is positive and says passing is realistic with homework and attention.

Main concern

There is too little online evidence to judge online workload or policies confidently.

What students said

“Ms. and helpful.”
ESL25
“If you do the homework and pay attention during class, you going to pass.”
ESL25

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and final, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring.

In-Class EssaysMidterm MentionedFinal MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final, but do not clearly prove specific exam rules beyond that.

In-Class EssaysMidterm MentionedFinal Mentioned
“2 in class essays for and 3 out of class essays.”
ENGL1A
“3 essays and 2 in-class essays (Midterm/Finals).”
ENGL1A

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , but it really helped me improve my writing skills.”

Voice snapshots generated from 44 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“She cares about student's success and takes the time and .”

📚 Workload Reality

34/100

“Tons of homework but ”

⚖️

66/100

“ and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a caring and nice teacher.
  • She helped students with anything students asked for.
  • and give really good feedbacks.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Writing

  • There were lots of but they were fairly simple
  • There is a lot of reading and .
  • , but it really helped me improve my writing skills.

Theme 3

👥 About Group Work

  • .
  • She forces everyone to work on groups and she asks peers to review the .
  • Hating long time of group discussions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

44

Recent reviews read by the AI

44

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-four reviews span many years and show consistent themes , and group discussion.

Inside 44 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 531
4 out of 57
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ESL2610 reviews
ESL259 reviews
ESLL265 reviews
ESLL254 reviews
ESLL2373 reviews
Show 11 more courses
ENGL1A2 reviews
ESLL0252 reviews
071 review
304761 review
COS1261 review
ELLS251 review
ENG1A1 review
ESL1 review
ESL1651 review
ESL2491 review
ESLL2491 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 1 · A 11 · A- 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values