AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Ishmael Tarikh

D016 · INTROTOPOLI · POLIF000105 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you want a demanding political science class and can .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy PapersOpinion-Based GradingStrong In-Person LearningStrict Punctuality
  • and describes harsh, subjective grading.
  • him intelligent and worth learning from.
  • Students should expect reading, study guides, punctuality, and written work to matter.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

22/100

The only graded online , so an A looks hard to secure.

Online evidence is strongly negative about grading, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content sounds manageable but , and papers make the course feel demanding.

Online feedback makes the course feel harder through grading, while as study-based.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and students need to be on time.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Recommendation is split by format, but the strongest recent review says to find another teacher.

, while older in-person reviews are more favorable.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

The online review directly says grades depend on his opinion and tags him as a .

Format shift

Grading complaints come from the online review, while .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The online review includes so many papers, and and reading.

Format shift

Online evidence points to heavy papers, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

, but the online review says students may not learn much.

Format shift

Teaching experience is much better in person than online based on the supplied reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The clearest assessment evidence mentions , and a civic engagement project.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes papers, while , and a project.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and teaching while warning students to read, study, and arrive on time.

Main concern

Students need to keep up with , and strict start times.

What students said

“Amazing teacher to learn from.”
INTROTOPOLI
“ AND READING! and BE ON TIME!”
POLIF000105

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is very negative and and little learning value.

Main concern

Grades may feel based on opinion rather than work quality.

What students said

“If you're okay with receiving a grade based on his opinion rather than your quality of work, he's the guy for you.”
D016

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the structure.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The or final structure.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

The online review .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to learn something, find a real teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Amazing teacher to learn from.”

⚖️

18/100

“If you're okay with receiving a grade based on his opinion rather than your quality of work, he's the guy for you.”

📚 Preparation Required

45/100

“ AND READING! and BE ON TIME!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing teacher to learn from.
  • Pretty legit teacher; uses a lot of big words, very intelligent.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you're okay with receiving a grade based on his opinion rather than your quality of work, he's the guy for you.
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, and the online and in-person experiences conflict sharply.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

D0161 review
INTROTOPOLI1 review
POLIF0001051 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1