Is this an easy A?
FairEffort
56/100and easy tests, but many others report poor preparation and serious grade risk.
All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .
Foothill College · Mathematics
MATH1A · MATH1C · MATH2A · MATH101 · 1B · MATH51 · MATH1D · MATH2B · MATH49 · MATH22 · MATH1B · 27 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Some students describe easy grading and easy tests, but many others report poor preparation and serious grade risk.
All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online reviews available.
Is the course easy?
The math itself is challenging, and unclear lectures make the content harder for many students.
All course difficulty evidence comes from in-person math courses.
Is attendance flexible?
Reviews do not clearly prove a strict attendance policy, but success depends heavily on keeping up with homework and help sessions.
Only in-person evidence exists, and it does not clearly describe attendance rules.
Is this professor recommended?
Most negative reviews warn against taking him because lectures are unclear and tests may feel poorly aligned.
All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.
Course guide
Grading
Fair
54/100
Grading appears inconsistent, with some easy-test and extra-credit reports balanced by tough-grader complaints and poor outcomes.
Format shift
Only in-person reviews discuss grading.
Workload
Moderate
56/100
Homework is important but not usually described as overwhelming, and doing it carefully is repeatedly tied to success.
Format shift
Only in-person reviews mention workload.
Teaching experience
Poor
42/100
He is often described as knowledgeable and sometimes helpful, but many students say his lectures are confusing and poorly organized.
Format shift
Only in-person teaching evidence is available.
Assessment method
Balanced
63/100
Reviews mention tests, quizzes, homework, and a final, with exams carrying meaningful risk.
Format shift
Only in-person reviews describe assessments.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
In-person reviews are sharply divided, but the dominant concern is unclear lecture delivery despite his strong math knowledge.
Main concern
Students may need to teach themselves when lectures feel confusing or disconnected from tests.
What students said
“His lectures made no sense to me at all.”
“His tests were very easy and would give extra credit questions.”
“Just try hard and do the homework and you'll do well.”
Remote format
Low confidence
No stored summary is available for this format.
Main concern
No main concern is stored for this format.
Exam style
Exam evidence is mixed, with some students calling tests easy and others saying tests include material not covered well in class.
Assessment risk
Standard
52/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person reviews mention easy tests, quizzes, two midterms, a final, and complaints that tests may not match lecture preparation.
“His tests were very easy and would give extra credit questions.”
“There will be 2 midterms and a final.”
“tests on material not covered in class.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“He's a nice guy, just not suited to be a teacher. Listening to his lectures just confuses you more.”
“Very good at explaining mathematical concepts, especially the more abstract ideas.”
“Easy grading. He is a nice instructor. Just do your homework and revise before exam...u can get an A easily.”
“Stay Away !!! I've never seen anything like this before.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
27
Recent reviews read by the AI
27
Lifetime ratings
83/100
Evidence confidence
The 27 reviews span many courses and years, with consistent themes despite polarized ratings.
Inside 27 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
2 reported outcomes
A- 1
No reported values
C+ 1
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values