AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Najwa Jardali

ESLABC · ESL · ESL2 · ESL101 · ESL147 · ESL157 · ESL156 · ESLL236 · ESL167 · ESLL237 · ESL134 · ESL165 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you mainly want an easy ESL class and can tolerate weak instruction.

Best fit · Easy A HunterUnprepared TeachingEasy but Low ValueBoring ClassesUnclear GradingOften Late or Canceled
  • Many students say the class is easy, but they also say they learned little.
  • Repeated complaints mention poor preparation, late arrivals, canceled classes, and .
  • A smaller group describes her as friendly, helpful, and caring.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Getting an A appears fairly easy because several students mention easy tests, easy grading, or easy classes, even though .

The Easy A evidence comes almost entirely from in-person reviews, while the single .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The course content is usually described as basic or easy, but and boredom make learning harder than the material itself.

, while the online review is too vague to judge course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Attendance appears important because and another tag says skipping class means you will not pass.

Attendance evidence comes from in-person reviews only, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most because students report poor preparation, little learning, and unreliable class management.

Both formats are negative, but the online evidence is only one short review while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students often call her easy and one says she grades easy, but and slow.

Format shift

Lenient grading evidence is from in-person reviews, while the .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload varies because some students mention while others complain about lots of homework.

Format shift

Workload details come from in-person reviews only, with no useful online workload evidence.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Many students say she is unprepared, confusing, boring, late, or not helpful, despite some and helpful.

Format shift

The single online review is negative but vague, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and a final, but no single assessment type clearly dominates across all classes.

Format shift

, while the online review gives no assessment details.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

content but weak preparation, boring lessons, and little learning.

Main concern

Students often because class instruction was weak.

What students said

“We had to learn on our own.”
ESL2
“If u are looking for a .”
ESL156
“She grades easy.”
ESL167

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is negative and gives no detailed course mechanics.

Main concern

The online evidence is too thin and only says the instructor was not good.

What students said

“Shes not good”
ESL

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, with some comments saying tests or finals were hard but .

Test HeavyMidterm MentionedHard Final MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a , but do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy.

Test HeavyShort MidtermHard Final
“TEST HEAVY”
ESLL236
“Mid-term exam was only 50 mins for writing class.”
ESL
“VERY HARD IN .”
ESL147

Online

The online review does .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If u are looking for a easy teacher, take her class. But if u .”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and reliability. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“She does not know how to teach and she is not prepared most of the time.”

📈 Easy Grade Value

82/100

“She grades easy.”

⚠️ Reliability Concern

20/100

“She was always late. Sometimes she canceled her lessons.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • We had to learn on our own.
  • Didn't learn anything.
  • Very easy to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If u are looking for a .
  • The only impressions she gave me are LAZY and easy.
  • The .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Class Experience

  • She was always late. Sometimes she canceled her lessons.
  • SO VERY BORING and as if we are stupid or something.
  • It was waste of time and money.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

There are 23 reviews over many years with , and unreliable class management.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 58
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ESL1565 reviews
ESLL2364 reviews
ESL2 reviews
ESL1672 reviews
2261 review
Show 9 more courses
2271 review
ESL1011 review
ESL1341 review
ESL1471 review
ESL1571 review
ESL1651 review
ESL21 review
ESLABC1 review
ESLL2371 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1