AI Rate Professor

Foothill College · Health

Horowits Horowitz

HEALT21 · HEALT1 · HLTH21 · ENG4200 · HELTH21 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

, not for engaging lectures or strong classroom discussion.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy GradesExtra Credit HeavyBoring LecturesTextbook ReadingAttendance Points
  • Grades appear easy because of , and relatively simple exams.
  • Teaching quality is mixed, with several students criticizing textbook-style lectures and boring class sessions.
  • , and students may need to study carefully despite the easy-grade reputation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

85/100

and , though students still need to study and listen carefully.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course content is generally easy, but tricky multiple choice and careful listening can still matter.

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Attendance is not flexible because .

The .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

, which is often described as boring or textbook-based.

and clear teaching complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Students mention lots of , and a miss.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

76/100

The class is described as easy and relaxing, with limited assessment pressure beyond exams and attendance.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

He is described as friendly and helpful by some students, but and weak discussion.

Format shift

All and is mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Reviews emphasize three , and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

but mixed and often boring teaching.

Main concern

Lectures and offer little discussion.

What students said

“Very easy and relaxing class!”
HELTH21
“Read from the textbook the entire time.”
HLTH21

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews say exams are easy and clearly signposted, but they do not clearly prove open-book, take-home, webcam, or proctoring policies.

Three ExamsEasy ExamsTricky Multiple ChoiceClear Exam Scope

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence supports easy exams with tricky multiple choice and , but no specific proctoring or .

Three ExamsEasy ExamsTricky Multiple ChoiceClear Exam Scope
“ and if you have perfect attendance, you get two points, which is 2 percents actually.”
HELTH21
“Tells you exactly what .”
HLTH21

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very easy and relaxing class!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

📈 Easy Grade Path

85/100

“He gives out so many extra credits about 50%, so .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Read from the textbook the entire time.”

📝

62/100

“ , but you need to study since the .”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy class though.
  • Will need to study material to get an A.
  • Very easy and relaxing class!

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Read from the textbook the entire time.
  • Very nice teacher.

Theme 3

🧾

  • Tells you exactly what .
  • and if you have perfect attendance, you get two points, which is 2 percents actually.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

, but several are old and opinions on teaching quality are inconsistent.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HLTH213 reviews
ENG42001 review
HEALT11 review
HEALT211 review
HELTH211 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values