AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Yvette Butterworth

10STAT · MATH220 · MATH105 · MATH110 · MATH049 · MATH10 · MATH130 · ALGEB238 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you are comfortable learning math independently and putting in steady work.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing teaching qualityHeavy homeworkHard testsSelf-teaching riskHelpful outside class
  • Reviews are sharply split between and helpful and students who felt forced to teach themselves.
  • Homework and , and several students say attendance or outside help is needed to keep up.
  • Online , and high-stakes finals.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

A is possible with or strong effort, but , and self-teaching make it costly.

Online evidence is more exam-heavy, while and hard-work warnings.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Students often describe math content as hard, fast, and difficult to follow without outside work.

Both formats show challenge, but and self-teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

because students say missing class makes the notes and material hard to understand.

In-person reviews strongly support attendance importance, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation depends heavily on math confidence, since reviews range from excellent help to severe frustration.

Online reviews are mixed, and teaching complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some students mention or loyal grading, but others call her a .

Format shift

, while online reviews emphasize final exam weight.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Multiple reviews mention lots of , and .

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly mention lots of , and quizzes, while and notes.

Teaching experience

Poor

43/100

Teaching feedback is inconsistent but many students report , and self-teaching.

Format shift

In-person reviews are highly split, while online reviews include both praise and complaints about limited help.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Comments mention homework and quizzes, but midterms and .

Format shift

Online reviews clearly cite large final and , while and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly polarized, praising clarity and office help in some classes but and self-teaching.

Main concern

Many students say and the workload is heavy.

What students said

“I was basically teaching myself in the homework.”
MATH130
“ , but if you devote enough time to the subject, you'll do well.”
MATH10

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with one strong praise but two warnings about heavy work and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“Final is 50% of your grade and the midterm is 25%.”
MATH105
“the final exam is worth 60% of your entire grade.”
MATH10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and high-stakes tests, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book rules.

High-Stakes FinalHeavy Midterm WeightScantron FinalNo Partial CreditHard Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove specific exam rules such as open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring.

Hard TestsChallenging Tests
“ .”
MATH130
“ , but if you devote enough time to the subject, you'll do well.”
MATH10

Online

Online reviews mention large final weights, a 25% midterm, scantron format, and no partial credit, but .

High-Stakes FinalMidterm 25%Final 50%Final 60%Scantron FinalNo Partial Credit
“Final is 50% of your grade and the midterm is 25%.”
MATH105
“It's a scan tron and there is no partial credit.”
MATH10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I was basically teaching myself in the homework.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

43/100

“ and her notes are just atrocious.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“There is a lot of and if you don't show up to class to take the notes, theres just no way...”

⚖️ Grade Effort

42/100

“If ,and her office), you r gonna get A!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are crystally clear - she analyzes in details all topics with numerous examples.
  • She isn't good with communicating to her students.
  • . feel like if own.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • , but if you devote enough time to the subject, you'll do well.
  • I received a 101% in the class after but my success in the class will largely be credited towards my like and passion for math.
  • .

Theme 3

🧭 About Course Structure

  • Lectures at home, work in class so .
  • There is no text book and you must learn from online content.
  • Final is 50% of your grade and the midterm is 25%.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because it uses 20 reviews across many years with detailed and consistent workload and teaching themes.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH1010 reviews
MATH1052 reviews
MATH1102 reviews
10STAT1 review
ALGEB2381 review
Show 4 more courses
MATH 1051 review
MATH0491 review
MATH1301 review
MATH2201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1