AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Nikolas Psomas

MATH48 · 48A · MATH10 · STATS101 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
7/100
RMP rating
1.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you can teach yourself the material and handle a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing explanationsTest heavyHeavy homeworkSelf-teaching requiredNot recommended
  • Students consistently describe his teaching as confusing and ineffective.
  • Grades and quizzes carrying limited weight.
  • The workload is high, especially online homework, without enough teaching support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

One student earned an A, but comments and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The math content becomes harder because and students must learn from the textbook or outside help.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as mandatory, but participation and lecture structure suggest students are expected to attend.

and is not very explicit.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students overwhelmingly advise against taking him because , and test-heavy.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students , and grades that depend heavily on tests.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of and .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students consistently , and not helpful for learning.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

91/100

Students report that while homework and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are consistently negative, , and .

Main concern

Students say they had to rely on textbooks and outside help because lectures did not make sense.

What students said

“Textbook was clearer than the teacher.”
MATH10
“ .”
STATS101
“ .”
MATH48

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly show a performance, but exam rules are not otherwise proven.

Test HeavyHigh Test WeightFew Tests Worth Large Percentage

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or exam format rules.

Test HeavyHigh Test WeightFew Tests Worth Large Percentage
“Small amount of grade.”
MATH10
“ .”
MATH48

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are taking him, be prepared to learn from your textbook and additional help outside of class, because he clearly cannot teach.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“He doesn't know how to teach.”

📚 Workload Load

12/100

“Insane amount of and time consuming problems.”

🧪

91/100

“Small amount of grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Textbook was clearer than the teacher.
  • .
  • he knows the subject but doesn't know how to teach.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • .
  • Small amount of grade.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • .
  • Insane amount of and time consuming problems.
  • His classes are very lecture heavy.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

and strongly consistent, though the sample is modest and concentrated in one period.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

48A2 reviews
MATH482 reviews
MATH101 review
STATS1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1