AI Rate Professor

Foothill College · Mathematics

Sarah Delossantos

MATH1A · CALC1C · MATH220 · MATH3 · MATH105 · MATH230 · MATH101 · MATH1B · MATH51 · CALC1B · PRECA1 · MATH110 · MATH49 · MATH10 · AA · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

She is a strong choice if you will do the homework and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHomework-Based ExamsHelpful And PatientClear Enough For ManyEffort Pays OffSometimes Boring
  • Many students say tests and problems.
  • She is often described as kind, patient, and willing to help.
  • Some students find her lectures boring or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

The A is very reachable because , but students still need consistent practice.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The content is manageable because , though some calculus and advanced .

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person math classes.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Some reviews say attendance is not required while .

, and the comments conflict by course.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Grades are generally fair and attainable when students do homework, though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

64/100

Students repeatedly , and notes, but the workload is predictable.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most reviews describe her as helpful, patient, and , but a minority say lectures are boring or confusing.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment , and occasional projects.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

whose assessments closely follow homework, though some students find her explanations basic or confusing.

Main concern

Students who need deep conceptual explanations may find lectures too basic or dull.

What students said

“Test questions are exactly like the .”
MATH10
“You put in hard work and effort, you get an A.”
MATH10
“She only shows basic examples, which makes it hard to apply the concepts to other problems...”
MATH1B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally student-friendly because and may allow notecards.

Homework-Like ExamsNotecards AllowedFew Test QuestionsTwo Midterms And Final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly , and a final, but do not prove proctoring rules.

Homework-Like ExamsNotecards AllowedTwo Midterms And Final
“FILL OUT YOUR NOTECARDS that you !!”
MATH10
“All the quizzes, exams and .”
MATH1A
“ and .”
MATH10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You put in hard work and effort, you get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ and .”

📈 Grade Path

82/100

“You put in hard work and effort, you get an A.”

📝

82/100

“Test questions are exactly like the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She tries to reach out to and clear.
  • , and very patient.
  • She has a hard time explaining the material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you do the .
  • and are usually easier than the questions from the textbook.
  • Making any mistake will cost a lot.

Theme 3

📝

  • Do all the homework and problems on textbook.
  • The and .
  • but is not graded.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 37 in-person reviews over many years repeat the same pattern of and helpful support.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 59
3 out of 55
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH498 reviews
MATH1B6 reviews
MATH105 reviews
MATH1A4 reviews
MATH2303 reviews
Show 10 more courses
MATH2202 reviews
AA1 review
CALC1B1 review
CALC1C1 review
MATH1011 review
MATH1051 review
MATH1101 review
MATH31 review
MATH511 review
PRECA11 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values