AI Rate Professor

Economics

Yulia Yukina

ECONB001B · ECON1A · 1B · ECON1B · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if possible, but if you can teach yourself and manage strict pacing.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and helpfulClear in person lecturesSelf-learning onlineStrict deadlines onlineExtra credit available
  • .
  • Getting an A is realistic with , and participation.
  • Online sections feel fast-paced, self-directed, and deadline-heavy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is achievable, especially in person, but students , and participation rather than expecting a free grade.

, while online reviews warn that the course is fast and self-directed.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The economics content is manageable for prepared students, but online pacing and some fast lectures make it less beginner-proof.

, while online students describe heavier self-teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

review, and online students report strict deadlines rather than flexible pacing.

, while online evidence emphasizes deadline rigidity.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

, but online reviews are much more hesitant because of weak structure.

Recommendation is high for in-person sections and mixed to poor for online sections.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Grades can be good with steady work, and participation helps, but she is also tagged as a .

Format shift

because students cite and easy-A outcomes.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

, and exams are regular, with online six-week sections feeling especially compressed.

Format shift

Online workload is heavier and faster-paced, while .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

She is caring and , but online students report limited instruction and poor structure.

Format shift

Teaching quality is much stronger in person than online.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention homework, quizzes, midterms, finals, textbook reading, and participation .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize quizzes, midterms, and finals, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, praising her care, clarity, examples, and .

Main concern

Some students say lectures move fast or .

What students said

“ and the .”
ECON1A
“It was an easy A for me.”
ECON1A
“ .”
ECONB001B

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe a self-learning course with easy or open-book midterms but weak structure, fast pacing, and strict deadlines.

Main concern

Students must manage the , and .

What students said

“The teacher is hardly online and doesn't update the students on what we should be doing.”
ECON1B
“Too fast paced.”
ECON1B
“Very strict w/ deadlines, defeats purpose of learn at your own pace.”
ECON1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because some online tests are open book and easy, but students also report difficult wording and an .

Open-Book Online TestsIn-Person FinalEasy MidtermsDifficult or Poorly Worded Questions

Assessment risk

Varies

57/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention midterms and finals but do not .

MidtermsFinalTests Cover Subject
“ and the .”
ECON1A
“2 Midterms, 1 Final.”
ECONB001B

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention open-book quizzes and midterms, but also an and .

Open-Book TestsIn-Person FinalClosed-Book FinalPoorly Worded Questions
“The but there is no structure to this course.”
ECON1B
“But so as long as you can finish the quiz and understand the concepts, the .”
ECON1B
“ .”
ECON1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you are willing to self study, if ”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting format differences in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She truly cares about her students.”

👍 Recommendation Split

74/100

“I highly recommend going to her on campus class because and her exams were during the day time.”

📈 Grade Effort

68/100

“It was an easy A for me.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and the .
  • She truly cares about her students.
  • Yulia didn't provide much instruction other than giving if you participate in the .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload and Pacing

  • Too fast paced.
  • You do need to read the book, do well on the group work, and turn in good grade!
  • Very strict w/ deadlines, defeats purpose of learn at your own pace.

Theme 3

📝 About Exams and Grades

  • The but there is no structure to this course.
  • .
  • Participation is so participate!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews across several years give consistent format-specific patterns, though some older reviews limit current certainty.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ECON1B10 reviews
ECON1A7 reviews
1B1 review
ECONB001B1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 3