AI Rate Professor

English

Katherine McCormick

ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENGLISH1A · ENG220 · ENG209 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
69/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take her if and can handle a demanding English course with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderStrong feedbackHeavy writingParticipation mattersCaring but demanding
  • , and class engagement.
  • The course requires substantial writing, reading, and participation.
  • Grades can feel strict, especially for students who dislike constrained essay prompts.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

48/100

Good grades are possible, but , and the need to meet detailed essay expectations.

Online evidence stresses weekly workload, while and participation pressure.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The content is normal for English composition, but the volume of writing and .

Online reviews emphasize workload, while and essay constraints.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Participation is repeatedly described as key, and multiple tags warn that skipping class can hurt performance.

The online review mentions participation, while and success.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and care, but several warn against her strictness and high expectations.

The single online review is strongly positive, while but lean positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

because multiple students call her a tough grader and describe .

Format shift

, while the online review only says she expects a lot.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload is heavy because students report many papers, weekly assignments, reading, and hours spent revising essays.

Format shift

Both formats show high workload, with the online review .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Her teaching is generally strong because , and engaging class activities despite mixed reactions to strictness.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is very positive, while but more divided.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment appears assignment-heavy, , and revision rather than exams.

Format shift

and assignments as the main assessment method.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but mostly positive, with strong praise for feedback and care and participation pressure.

Main concern

and required participation can frustrate students.

What students said

“Professor McCormick is a ”
ENGL1A
“She gives out plenty of handouts of guidelines and essay examples”
ENG209
“You get lots of .”
ENGLISH1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review praises her help and fast responses but warns that the class .

Main concern

Falling behind is easy because .

What students said

“Expect to write A LOT.”
ENGL1A
“There are ”
ENGL1A
“She expects a lot, but gives you the tools you need to succeed”
ENGL1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mainly discuss papers and participation, and they do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyOne Mention Of Easy TestsWriting-Focused Assessment

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and participation, with one vague mention that tests are easy but .

One Mention Of Easy TestsWriting-Focused AssessmentReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“ ”
ENG209

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam policy, proctoring, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She expects a lot, but gives you the tools you need to succeed :)”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and participation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Prof McCormick goes above and beyond helping her students!”

⚖️

35/100

“Professor McCormick is a ”

📝 Workload Pressure

25/100

“Expect to write A LOT.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She gives out plenty of handouts of guidelines and essay.
  • You get lots of .
  • She gives a ton of feed back and does a lot of fun activities in class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Professor McCormick is a
  • She sets too many constraints and
  • You have to answer every part of the prompt in order to get a good grade.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Participation

  • There are
  • PARTICIPATE IN !)
  • Yes you have to write and read but its an English class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across online and and consistent themes, though all reviews are from early 2017.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL1A4 reviews
ENG2092 reviews
ENG1A1 review
ENG2201 review
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 1 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1