AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Robert Lieberman

48A · MATH48A · ALG110 · MATH105 · MATHF105 · MATH048A · MATH11 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you are comfortable with challenging math, lecture-heavy learning, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard testsLecture heavyCaring but polarizingRequires self-studyFair if prepared
  • Students repeatedly say exams and quizzes.
  • Teaching and and condescending.
  • An A is possible, but usually requires steady work, lecture notes, and outside help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A is reachable through homework, quizzes, notes, and office hours, but .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content is often fast, abstract, and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Students warn that skipping class is risky because .

, and they strongly favor attending class.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

but warn weaker or beginner students away.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, and quizzes, but and some students call him tough.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

, and outside practice are common expectations.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Some students praise his clarity and care, while others find his examples weak and lectures .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Homework and quizzes matter, but .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a funny and and whose teaching style works best for prepared STEM-focused students.

Main concern

, or examples.

What students said

“you're a STEM student or you are craving a challenge.”
MATH048A
“Tests are very hard and .”
MATH48A
“He made me love math again.”
MATH105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are consistently described as tough and , though partial credit may help.

Hard TestsLecture-Based QuestionsWeekly QuizzesCredit For Attempts

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and exam questions tied to lectures rather than homework.

Hard TestsWeekly QuizzesLecture-Based QuestionsCredit For Attempts
“Tests are very hard and .”
MATH48A
“ .”
MATH48A
“ and quizzes.”
MATH105

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“you're a STEM student or you are craving a challenge.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“He made me love math again.”

⚠️

32/100

“Tests are very hard and .”

👍 Recommendation Fit

50/100

“ if you: don't care for math or don't wish to make mathematics your life in anyway.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He made me love math again.
  • .
  • He's a and slowly; is happy to answer questions and really wants everyone to learn as well as be good in math.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • The hw and so stock up since the tests typically contain random questions from his lectures and do not relate to the hw/quizzes.
  • Expect to work hard.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He is super funny and really cares about helping you.
  • He is a funny, caring, and helpful teacher.
  • He is condescending.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen detailed in-person reviews across several math courses show a consistent pattern of and mixed teaching experiences.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1057 reviews
MATH48A4 reviews
48A1 review
ALG1101 review
MATH048A1 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH111 review
MATHF1051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 2