AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Dee Vance-Lee

MUSP24 · COUNSELING50 · COUN50 · CNSL053 · COUNS53 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid this professor unless , and disproportionate writing demands.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing instructionsPoor organizationSlow communicationHeavy extra creditWeak grading clarity
  • Most reviews , and disorganized course materials.
  • and missed-quiz alternatives often require extremely long papers that students see as unreasonable.
  • One older music review is positive, but counseling reviews are strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

exists, but students describe it as long, unclear, and .

Online reviews mention and vague paper prompts, while in-person reviews describe extreme paper alternatives and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The counseling content sounds basic, but disorganization and the material itself.

Both formats suggest the subject should be easy, but poor structure makes the experience harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent attendance policy, though .

Online reviews do not establish attendance rules, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students overwhelmingly warn against taking her because the , and hard to navigate.

Both online and unrelated music review sounding positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

No grade distribution is available, and and disproportionate paper requirements.

Format shift

Online reviews cite vague paper instructions, while and extreme paper options.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

The workload is inflated by 20-page to 50-page paper options that students call unreasonable for counseling classes.

Format shift

Online reviews mention a 20-page paper, while in-person reviews mention 30-page to 50-page paper alternatives.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Most students describe confusing instructions, poor organization, unanswered questions, and weak communication.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on disorganized materials and slow replies, while and quiz preparation.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and rather than a single dominant assessment type.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes papers and assignments, while , and long paper alternatives.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews mostly report confusing , and poor quiz preparation.

Main concern

Students report confusing instructions and .

What students said

“There is CONFUSING, and NO study guides.”
COUNS53
“She has an option to have you write a 30-50 page paper for an extra 300-500 points instead of taking exams.”
COUN50

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe disorganized assignments, , and that is not practical.

Main concern

Students may .

What students said

“No due dates on the syllabus.”
COUNS53
“She gave plenty of so that you can raise your grade, but the main problem with her was that she wouldn't write instructions for the .”
CNSL053

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and , but they do not clearly prove open-book status, proctoring, or .

Quizzes mentionedExam replacement papersUnclear study guidance

Assessment risk

Varies

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and paper alternatives, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring.

Campus quizzesPaper instead of examsNo study guides
“The quizzes are inconvenient due to having to .”
COUN50
“The and she only tells you what chapters the .”
COUNS53

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There is CONFUSING, and NO study guides.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Don't take her COUNSELING 50..... ....oh my gosh~~~~”

⚖️

25/100

“There is CONFUSING, and NO study guides.”

📚 Workload Burden

20/100

“Never in ANY of my academic classes have I been asked to write a 50p paper!”

Theme 1

🧭 About Organization

  • No due dates on the syllabus.
  • The assign are out of order on the assign page.
  • Due dates are sporadic (no pattern).

Theme 2

📄 About Papers and Workload

  • EC is a as small assign.
  • She has an option to have you write a 30-50 page paper for an extra 300-500 points instead of taking exams.
  • Never in ANY of my academic classes have I been asked to write a 50p paper!

Theme 3

💬 About Support

  • Takes up to 1wk to rspnd to emails.
  • Questions online remain unanswered.
  • Useless

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across many years show a consistent negative pattern in counseling courses, though one unrelated music review is positive.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CNSL0532 reviews
COUNS532 reviews
COUN501 review
COUNSELING501 review
MUSP241 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values