AI Rate Professor

EMT Paramedic

Jarod Middleton

EMR50 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
99/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take him if you want a to real field experience.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHighly recommendedCaringReal-world experienceAlways availableKnowledgeable
  • The only review is extremely positive and praises his knowledge, care, and availability.
  • Students value his active paramedic experience because it adds practical context beyond the book.
  • Evidence is strong in tone but limited by having only one review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

The review suggests strong support and fair help, but it does not claim the class is an easy A or low effort.

Evidence comes only from one in-person review, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

EMT content appears moderately demanding, but real-world examples and availability make it easier to learn.

Evidence comes only from one in-person review, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Evidence comes only from one in-person review, and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

The student strongly recommends him because , and connects lessons to real paramedic work.

Evidence comes only from one in-person review, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

The review says he wants students to succeed but gives no direct evidence of .

Format shift

Only one in-person review exists, and .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The review gives no workload complaints, but EMT material likely requires normal professional training effort.

Format shift

Only one in-person review exists, and .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

The review praises his knowledge, care, availability, and real-world teaching context.

Format shift

Teaching evidence comes only .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not identify whether .

Format shift

Only one in-person review exists, and it does not describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The in-person review describes a , and highly recommended.

Main concern

The evidence is very positive but based on only one review.

What students said

“Awesome instructor.”
EMR50
“Truly cares about his students and wants to see everyone succeed.”
EMR50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, open-book rules, proctoring, quiz structure, midterm format, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , open-book rules, proctoring, quiz structure, midterm format, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Truly cares about his students and wants to see everyone succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, and recommendation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Awesome instructor.”

❤️ Student Support

95/100

“He is very present and and to answer any questions.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very knowledgeable about being an EMT and paramedic.
  • He is a working paramedic so he he can offer real world experience in addition to the book.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • Truly cares about his students and wants to see everyone succeed.
  • He is very present and and to answer any questions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

The single review is detailed and consistent but too limited to support high confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

EMR501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values