AI Rate Professor

English

Nikolaos Kyriakou

F001A · ENGL1A · ENG1B · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
57/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take him if and , but expect essays and some organization problems.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringStrong feedbackDisorganizedEssay heavyEngaging readings
  • Students consistently say he cares and .
  • Early reviews describe major organization problems, including late starts, shifting syllabi, and weak lesson planning.
  • The course is essay-heavy and can reward engaged students, but the experience depends on tolerance for structure issues.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Grades can be good, but students , and participation expectations.

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The English content is manageable and sometimes engaging, but , and inconsistent organization add difficulty.

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

Participation matters and one tag warns that skipping class can hurt performance, but no review proves a .

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, where participation appears important.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

, and engaging material, but hesitate because of disorganization and .

, and opinions are split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Reported grades are solid, but , and participation expectations.

Format shift

, and they show mixed grading experiences.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Students disagree on workload, but and one review explicitly tags lots of homework.

Format shift

as the main workload issue.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

He is caring and , but early organization and planning problems lower the teaching experience.

Format shift

, and they mix strong personal support with weak course structure.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and pop quizzes rather than major exams.

Format shift

, and assessment evidence is assignment-heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and interesting readings while criticizing disorganization and essay-heavy grading.

Main concern

Students may struggle with , and essay-heavy assessment.

What students said

“ and thorough.”
ENGL1A
“He continued to never have any lesson plans and changed the syllabus 7 or more times.”
F001A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention pop quizzes and , but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, midterm format, or .

Pop quizzes mentionedEssay-based gradingFew graded items

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and few graded items, but do not clearly prove exam rules, proctoring, midterm format, or .

Pop quizzesFew graded itemsEssay focus
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
F001A
“He does not assign a lot of work just a lot of essays.”
ENGL1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and thorough.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“He really cares about his students and has a passion for English/Journalism which I admire.”

🧭 Organization Risk

35/100

“He continued to never have any lesson plans and changed the syllabus 7 or more times.”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“This was my last English class but if I had to take another English !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and thorough.
  • He really tries to make the material relatable to the students.
  • Mr.K was super awesome.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • He does not assign a lot of work just a lot of essays.
  • GRADED BY FEW THINGS
  • BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES

Theme 3

🧭 About Organization

  • It was pretty shaky and all over the place.
  • He was 20 minutes late ill prepared
  • He continued to never have any lesson plans and changed the syllabus 7 or more times.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

65/100

Evidence confidence

but show mixed opinions and no online evidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL1A2 reviews
ENG1B1 review
F001A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values