AI Rate Professor

Computer Applications

Hadeel Ammari

CS030A · CS030B · CS2A · CS30A · CS020A · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

unless you can teach yourself and and grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing InstructionsPoor OrganizationSelf-Taught RequiredUnclear GradingTimed Quizzes
  • , and weak support.
  • Online students report mixed experiences, with a few positive reviews but many complaints about organization and grading.
  • In-person reviews are , and fast pacing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Even when doing well is , and penalty rules make an A costly.

Online reviews give the clearest grade-risk evidence, while and poor instruction.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The subject may not be inherently impossible, but confusing materials, fast pacing, and .

Both formats report confusion, with online reviews adding more detail about poor materials and self-teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, though one in-person review says participation matters.

Online reviews do not clearly prove an , while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

because the course is disorganized, confusing, and poorly supported.

Both formats include negative recommendations, though online reviews also include a few positive outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students describe unclear grading, a 94 percent A cutoff, technical penalties, and .

Format shift

Online reviews provide the strongest grading complaints, while .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload itself is not always described as huge, but and self-teaching make the effort feel heavier.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize homework, tests, forums, and reading, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Most comments , and poor responsiveness.

Format shift

Both formats are negative overall, with online reviews showing a wider range from very good to very poor.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and practice problems, so assessment appears mixed.

Format shift

Online reviews provide most assessment details, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, citing unreliable communication, poor organization, and .

Main concern

Students report and unreliable support.

What students said

“unreliable”
CS030B
“ .”
CS30A
“The class moves really fast”
CS030A

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed but mostly warn that the course is confusing, self-taught, and .

Main concern

Students often must learn from the book with limited guidance and .

What students said

“she doesn't teach”
CS030B
“you basically read the book and and !”
CS030B
“She gives extra credits.”
CS2A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention timed quizzes and tests, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, .

Timed QuizzesTestsHomeworkForums

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or final policies.

Quiz AmbiguityHomework Ambiguity
“frequent ambiguity with quizhw questions.”
CS30A

Online

, and quizzes, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or final policies.

Timed QuizzesTestsHomeworkForums
“you basically read the book and and ”
CS030B
“ ”
CS2A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You have to already know the subject matter before you begin.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“I'm sure Prof Hadeel is a nice person, but she doesn't teach.”

⚖️

28/100

“Her grade book is definitely rediculous, 94% is the bottom of A.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she doesn't teach
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Technicality here and there makes it difficult to get an A.
  • 94% is the bottom of A.
  • Not hard to do well but you have to navigate the maze of .

Theme 3

💬 About Support and Organization

  • unresponsive
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 13 reviews across online and few positive outliers.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CS030B4 reviews
CS2A4 reviews
CS020A2 reviews
CS030A2 reviews
CS30A1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Pass 2