AI Rate Professor

Foothill College · Art

Linda Lum

ART · ART020A · ART20 · ART20A · FORGOT · ARTS6 · ART4B · ART20ACOLOR · ART4A · DRAWC · 4B · COLORI · ART6 · COLORAB · ART006 · COLOR020A · COLORTHEORYA · COLOR20A · ART20AB · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take Lum if you genuinely want art practice and can handle disorganization, but if and steady feedback.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDisorganizedUnclear FeedbackHelpful When EngagedEasy If You Do WorkArt-Focused
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with many praising her art knowledge and kindness while many criticize disorganization and .
  • The course often seems easy to pass or earn a strong grade if work is completed, but feedback and .
  • Online reviews are riskier because students report , and little visibility into grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many reviews suggest a good grade is attainable by completing projects, though and .

In-person reviews , while online reviews include both an A with frustration and a B+ with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

67/100

The content is often introductory and slow-paced, but and subjective art expectations can make it harder than it should be.

In-person reviews describe slow pace and easy work more often, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, but some reviews mention meetings, critiques, labs, or a no-talking rule rather than a .

Online-related comments mention required meetings for visual review, while rule.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

She is worth considering for motivated art students, but inconsistent communication and needing structure.

Online reviews are more negative and uncertain, while and more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Several students call her easy or not harsh if , though some report subjective or .

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most evidence of , while .

Workload

Light

70/100

Workload is usually project-based and often described as easy, with examples like drawing one hour per week and no tests.

Format shift

, while online reviews focus more on confusion than volume.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Her art knowledge and caring help some students, but , and weak feedback are recurring problems.

Format shift

and negatives, while online evidence is more polarized and feedback-focused.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears dominated by projects, assignments, critiques, and .

Format shift

Both formats point toward assignment-based assessment, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but show a consistent pattern of art knowledge, helpfulness for engaged students, and .

Main concern

Lectures and , and unclear.

What students said

She is not a if you turn in all the .
ART20
, but she is very into art.
ART4A
She taught me a great deal, but then I show up and work.
ART4B

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are polarized, with one praising her caring encouragement and and .

Main concern

Online students may not receive clear instructions, grades, or .

What students said

The
ART20
Linda's kindness, flexibility and caring
ART20A
.
ART020A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews point to a project-based art course with no clearly supported traditional exam risk, and .

No TestsFinal Field TripProjectsCritiques

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and critique-based course, including one review that says there are no tests and the .

No TestsFinal Field TripProjectsCritiques
HW: draw for an : : Field trip :)
ART4A
Class critiques were very helpful and we had these almost weekly.
COLORTHEORYA

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, quiz, midterm, or .

Assignments
.
ART020A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

, but she is very into art.

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

54/100

, but she is very into art.

⚖️

74/100

She is not a if you turn in all the .

📚 Workload Shape

70/100

HW: draw for an : : Field trip :)

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • but interesting.
  • , but she is very into art.
  • She has an amazing eye for detail, which helped me out a lot.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • if you turn in all the .
  • its an easy A if you do the work and critque your work.
  • Easy teacher as long as you follow what she said.

Theme 3

💬 and Clarity

  • The
  • doesn't give grades, .
  • a question.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 37 reviews span many years and show consistent themes despite polarized opinions.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 511
3 out of 54
2 out of 58
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ART20A7 reviews
ART4A4 reviews
ART203 reviews
ART4B3 reviews
ART2 reviews
Show 14 more courses
ART020A2 reviews
ART20AB2 reviews
ART62 reviews
COLOR20A2 reviews
4B1 review
ART0061 review
ART20ACOLOR1 review
ARTS61 review
COLOR020A1 review
COLORAB1 review
COLORI1 review
COLORTHEORYA1 review
DRAWC1 review
FORGOT1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1