AI Rate Professor

Geography

Amber Brooks

GEO001 · GEOG001 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless , and tricky tests.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing ModulesTricky TestsPoor Feedback TimingExpensive AtlasNot Recommended
  • and unclear testing.
  • Online reviews describe tricky fill-in-the-blank tests and .
  • The single in-person-counted review still describes an online experience, but format rules classify it as in person.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

One student earned an A, but , and little feedback before final grades.

Online reviews stress tricky tests, while the .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The geography content may be introductory, but , broken modules, and trick-style tests make the course hard to navigate.

Online reviews provide the strongest evidence of confusing modules and tests, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove any attendance requirement or flexibility policy.

Neither online nor .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

No reviewer would take her again, and the comments focus , and unfair-feeling tests.

Both online and in-person-counted evidence are negative, with online reviews giving more detail.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students complain about grading expectations and tricky tests, even though reported grades are not uniformly low.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize test design, while the .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students report needing to read the , and buy an atlas with little usefulness.

Format shift

Online reviews drive the heavy-workload judgment, while the in-person-counted review criticizes course setup.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Reviews consistently describe , poorly built modules, and .

Format shift

Online reviews are more detailed, while the in-person-counted review is also negative about course management.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

Student complaints focus heavily on tests, quizzes, and the .

Format shift

Online reviews mention tests and the final, while the and unreturned work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in-person-counted review is negative and .

Main concern

No graded work was returned before the course ended.

What students said

“Zero work is returned graded before the end of the course so we have no chance and expectations.”
GEO001

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are negative, , and a required atlas with little value.

Main concern

Tests and , and designed to trick students.

What students said

“ trick you.”
GEOG001
“Modules are poorly put together with lots of .”
GEOG001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as tricky and disconnected from lectures, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Fill-in-the-Blank TestsTricky TestsRequired Atlas For FinalQuizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The in-person-counted review mentions quizzes copied from the internet, but .

Quizzes
“ internet.”
GEO001

Online

Online reviews describe fill-in-the-blank and trick-style tests, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Fill-in-the-Blank TestsTricky TestsRequired Atlas For Final
“ trick you.”
GEOG001
“ learn and feel more like she's trying to trick you.”
GEOG001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ trick you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and materials. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“ .”

👎 Recommendation Rate

15/100

“Its like she's constantly trying to prove she's better then you.”

🧪

25/100

“ learn and feel more like she's trying to trick you.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Modules are poorly put together with lots of .
  • Her course modules are obviously cut and pasted as there are repeats everywhere.

Theme 2

🧪 About Tests

  • trick you.
  • learn and feel more like she's trying to trick you.
  • internet.

Theme 3

💸

  • Be prepared to read the entire book.
  • Used the atlas 1 time & only for a .
  • Zero work is returned graded before the end of the course so we have no chance and expectations.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are recent to each other, detailed, and consistently negative.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

GEOG0012 reviews
GEO0011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values