AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Alicia Samis

PSYC30 · GENPSYC · PSYC030 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Samis is generally a good choice for students who , and responsive help, though one review warns of .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear assignmentsResponsive helpFair gradingMixed clarityStudent-friendly pacing
  • Most reviews praise Samis for , and enough time to complete work.
  • One in-person review , and boring lectures.
  • The online evidence is positive but thin because it comes from only one very short review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A seems reachable with , and enough time, though one review warns that tests and .

Online evidence is only one brief A review, while negative outlier.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The course appears manageable because and paced with enough time, despite one report of and tests.

Online evidence is too short for depth, while and are mostly positive.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend her because , and .

Online evidence is positive but minimal, while negative review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

74/100

and manageable, with students praising ample time and fairness rather than extreme generosity.

Format shift

, while the single online A review is too brief to prove leniency.

Workload

Light

76/100

Workload seems light to moderate because students say and given with plenty of time.

Format shift

, while online evidence is too brief.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Teaching quality is good overall because most reviews praise clarity and help, though one review reports severe confusion.

Format shift

Online teaching has only brief positive evidence, while but mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Assessment evidence points more to assignments and clearly.

Format shift

and tests, while online evidence does not describe assessment details.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly positive , and time to finish assignments, with one strong negative outlier.

Main concern

A , and boring lectures.

What students said

“A wonderful person and great teacher.”
GENPSYC
“Professor Samis and gave us plenty of time to complete them.”
PSYC30
“ , and teaching are absolutely ridiculous”
30130

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The single online review is very positive but too short to support detailed conclusions.

Main concern

The evidence is too limited to judge the online experience deeply.

What students said

“Awesome.”
PSYC030

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Tests mentionedExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

Tests mentionedExam policy not clearly proven
“ , and teaching are absolutely ridiculous”
30130

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A wonderful person and great teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and clarity. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“A wonderful person and great teacher.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“ .”

⚖️

74/100

“She grades fair and gives ample .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Samis
  • She is always willing to answer any questions or clarify any misunderstandings.
  • her lectures are very boring.

Theme 2

📈

  • gave us plenty of time to complete them.
  • She grades fair and gives ample .
  • , and teaching are absolutely ridiculous

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • and helps you if you need the help.
  • .
  • Awesome.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews are available, and one online review is very short, but the mostly positive pattern with one negative outlier.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

301301 review
GENPSYC1 review
PSYC0301 review
PSYC301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values