AI Rate Professor

Foothill College · Fine Arts

Carol Wolf

PLAYWRIT · BEGPLAYWRITING · THEA1 · THTR1 · PLAYWRITING · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

grade, but avoid in-person playwriting with this professor.

Best fit · Easy A HunterOnline Easy AHelpful OnlinePoor In-Person FeedbackDisorganized SyllabusAvoid Playwriting
  • Online theatre reviews describe an easy and .
  • In-person playwriting reviews are mostly harsh, citing rude behavior, weak critiques, and disorganization.
  • The experience depends strongly on format and course type.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Online theatre appears to be an easy A, but in-person playwriting grades and .

Online evidence is strongly easy-A, while and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

47/100

Theatre content sounds simple online, but playwriting expectations and critiques make the in-person course feel harder.

Online theatre sounds introductory, while in-person playwriting sounds frustrating and restrictive.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Neither online nor in-person reviews clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is split because online students are happy, but .

, while in-person reviews repeatedly advise avoiding her class.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

, but in-person students describe bad scores and .

Format shift

, while .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Online work is limited to forums, plays, and quizzes, while but not the main complaint.

Format shift

Online workload sounds light, while and organization.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

The online teaching is praised, but , and unhelpful instruction.

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are positive, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews emphasize forum posts, playwriting assignments, critiques, and quizzes more than formal exams.

Format shift

Online mentions forums and quizzes, while and critiques.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person playwriting students report poor , and low satisfaction.

Main concern

and course structure hurt learning.

What students said

“Easily the .”
PLAYWRIT
“Her critiques are non helpful, she doesn't show up to class.”
PLAYWRITING

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online students describe a and achievable A grades.

Main concern

Evidence is old and limited to two online theatre reviews.

What students said

“Just do the required forum posting + watching live play and you'll get an A!”
THEA1
“She is simply awesome, always there to help you.”
THTR1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention book-based quizzes and a final, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or .

Book-Based QuizzesFinal MentionedExam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

proctoring policies.

Exam Policy Unclear

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes from the book and a final, but .

Book-Based QuizzesFinal MentionedPolicy Unclear
“ .”
THEA1
“I am going to write up the .”
THTR1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting the . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Her critiques are non helpful, she doesn't show up to class.”

📈 Easy A Evidence

58/100

“Just do the required forum posting + watching live play and you'll get an A!”

⚠️ Format Split

35/100

“She is simply awesome, always there to help you.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • ! Love how she structures her class.
  • Easily the .
  • This teacher is substandard, does not provide positive input or a Syllabus with the correct information.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • Just do the required forum posting + watching live play and you'll get an A!
  • I still got .
  • She helped me raise my grade by getting options and giving good advice.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews give a , but the comments are old and course coverage is uneven.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PLAYWRITING2 reviews
BEGPLAYWRITING1 review
PLAYWRIT1 review
THEA11 review
THTR11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1