Is this an easy A?
EasyA
77/100Several students say decent or high grades are achievable with regular review, practice tests, and .
All grade-effort evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.
MATH220 · MATH48B · MATH230235 · ELEMENTARYSTAT · MATH10 · 48B · 9 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Several students say decent or high grades are achievable with regular review, practice tests, and exam-focused grading despite weak lectures.
All grade-effort evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.
Is the course easy?
The math courses are described as not very hard by some students, but unclear explanations make the experience harder than the content itself.
Only in-person reviews describe course easiness.
Is attendance flexible?
Reviews do not clearly state an attendance policy, though notes are emailed and help is available after class or by Skype.
Attendance evidence is limited to in-person comments and does not prove a strict policy.
Is this professor recommended?
Recommendation depends on whether a student values one-on-one help enough to tolerate unclear and disorganized lectures.
All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews and is strongly mixed.
Course guide
Grading
Lenient
72/100
Students mention fair grading, practice tests, and decent grades, though tests carry most of the grade.
Format shift
All grading evidence is from in-person reviews.
Workload
Light
75/100
The class is described as not hard, with notes and practice tests, but exams dominate the grade.
Format shift
Only in-person reviews discuss workload.
Teaching experience
Poor
38/100
Many students call lectures unclear, boring, disorganized, or hard to understand despite her willingness to help.
Format shift
Teaching evidence is entirely from in-person classes.
Assessment method
FocusOnExams
85/100
Multiple reviews state tests or exams are worth most of the grade, including an 80 percent test weight.
Format shift
Only in-person reviews describe assessment weight.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
In-person reviews are divided, praising accessibility and fairness but often criticizing unclear, disorganized, and hard-to-follow teaching.
Main concern
Students frequently say they had to teach themselves because lectures were unclear.
What students said
“will spend plenty of time to explain anything you want after class or on skype, but lacks some clarity.”
“it's just to teach yourself for the most part.”
“It's extremely hard to understand what she is saying and she is very scatter-brained.”
Remote format
Low confidence
No stored summary is available for this format.
Main concern
No main concern is stored for this format.
Exam style
Exams dominate grading, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring style, open-book status, or exact exam rules.
Assessment risk
Standard
48/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person reviews say exams are the main grade component and practice tests are provided, but no clear proctoring or book policy is proven.
“she gives out practice tests and the exams are worth the most points”
“80% of the grade is tests.”
“Plus, tests are worth 80% of the grade.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“Dont take.If you sign up, it's just to teach yourself for the most part.”
“Very hard to follow.”
“it is not a difficult to get an A or above.”
“80% of the grade is tests.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
9
Recent reviews read by the AI
9
Lifetime ratings
74/100
Evidence confidence
Nine older in-person reviews provide a broad but polarized sample with repeated concerns about clarity and test-heavy grading.
Inside 9 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
1 reported outcomes
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
Audit/No Grade 1