AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Ladella Levy

POLISCI7 · GOVT2301 · POSC1 · POLI1 · POLISCI1 · PSC101 · POLISCI · POLI7 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want an energetic, challenging political science class, but as a positive signal.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate LecturerLife ChangingHighly RecommendedParticipation HeavyOnline Grading Risk
  • In-person students overwhelmingly describe her as passionate, dynamic, knowledgeable, and memorable.
  • The single online review is sharply negative, citing poor course design and .
  • and intellectually intense, so students should expect participation and engagement.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Several in-person comments describe easy grades when students participate and do the work, but one online review warns of .

, while the only online review describes grading as horrible.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The content is not described as technically hard, but the class demands critical thinking, participation, and engagement with serious political issues.

In-person reviews describe stimulating but manageable work, while the online review gives little content-detail beyond frustration.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation appears central to the in-person experience, but reviews do .

In-person reviews repeatedly mention participation; the .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most in-person students strongly recommend her for passion, subject command, and an inspiring classroom experience.

In-person recommendations are very strong, while the single online .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

students, but the online review reports harsh grading.

Format shift

Online , while in-person evidence is generally positive.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Reviews mention tests, papers, readings, and participation, but most do not describe the workload as overwhelming.

Format shift

In-person workload seems moderate, while the online review does not give enough workload detail.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Most students describe her as passionate, knowledgeable, energetic, and transformative despite a few negative outliers.

Format shift

, while the only online review describes a poor course experience.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Comments mention , and subject discussion, suggesting balanced assessment.

Format shift

In-person reviews mention tests and a paper; the online review .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly enthusiastic, emphasizing passion, knowledge, participation, and a transformative classroom experience.

Main concern

A few students report disorganization, weak feedback, or an overly emotional classroom tone.

What students said

“ !”
POLISCI7
“A !”
POLI7
“ ... pretty much frustrates you all semester”
GOVT2301

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is strongly negative and criticizes course design and grading.

Main concern

The online course was described as poorly assembled and harshly graded.

What students said

“ .”
PSC101
“It is patch worked together from other teacher's work, and she is a .”
PSC101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and a paper, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or .

Tests MentionedPaper MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a paper, but do not clearly prove whether exams were open-book, closed-book, or strictly proctored.

Tests MentionedPaper Mentioned
“she crammed in and a paper”
GOVT2301
“ .”
POLI1

Online

The but does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! Intense, passionate, and brings out the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Professor Levy is a truly dynamic, passionate and gifted instructor.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“A !”

⚠️ Online Risk

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is an amazing lady.
  • She is a gifted orator who knows her subject intimately and is brilliant.
  • She brings a lot of enthusiasm to her class.

Theme 2

❤️ About Impact

  • Prof. Levy will transform your way of thinking.
  • Her !
  • You will be changed after taking this class.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • ... pretty much frustrates you all semester
  • I did not feel the classroom environment fostered independent thought or critical thinking.
  • she is a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

There are 18 reviews over many years with strong consistency in in-person praise, but the data is old and online evidence is limited to one review.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

POLI77 reviews
POLISCI3 reviews
POLI12 reviews
POLISCI72 reviews
GOVT23011 review
Show 3 more courses
POLISCI11 review
POSC11 review
PSC1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1