AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Katie Dellamaggiore

STAT10 · NATH10 · STATSMATH · STATS10 · MATH110 · MATH10 · STATS · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
81/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you will attend and do the homework, but be cautious with the online version.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear Step By StepHelpful TeacherEasy A In PersonNotes AllowedOnline Caution
  • In-person students usually praise her clarity, patience, helpfulness, and ability to simplify statistics.
  • if students attend, follow notes, and .
  • Online reviews are much more negative, citing poor resources, no partial credit, and regret.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

In person, an A is very realistic with attendance and homework, but and no-partial-credit.

, while online reviews warn that many fail and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Statistics , but the online and hybrid formats can make the course feel harder.

In-person students find the course manageable with her teaching, while online students report more frustration.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

, but students repeatedly say showing up is important for doing well.

In-person reviews strongly recommend attendance, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

79/100

and support, though online experiences reduce confidence.

, while both online reviews are negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

In-person students cite easy tests, notes on exams, and realistic A outcomes, but .

Format shift

, while as unforgiving.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Homework and steady practice are important, with some students reporting several hours of work per week.

Format shift

, while online workload feels harder because resources are weaker.

Teaching experience

Good

83/100

Most students , and good at simplifying statistics, despite slower responses online.

Format shift

In-person teaching is praised strongly, while online support is criticized.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and a final rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

Both formats mention homework and exams, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, describing a and steady homework.

Main concern

Some students say the hybrid format or workload can be frustrating if they fall behind.

What students said

“ , and presents the material in a step by step format so it is easy to understand.”
STATS10
“easy if you put time into it.”
MATH10
“hard course, need to do ALL the .”
MATH10

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are negative, warning that the course can be frustrating, resource-dependent, and .

Main concern

Students report weak online support and .

What students said

“Beoga is a terrible sole resource, could work as text supplement.”
NATH10
“ !”
MATH10
“many fail and "no partial credit"”
NATH10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally student-friendly because notes are allowed and quizzes may be open book, though .

Notes Allowed On FinalOpen Book QuizzesMidterm And FinalNo Partial Credit Online

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

81/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or final and open-book quizzes, but do not clearly prove proctoring or closed-book rules.

Notes Allowed On Midterm And FinalOpen Book QuizzesMidterm And Final
“she and .”
MATH110
“ and final.”
STAT10
“There is a midterm and final (35% and 45% of grade)”
MATH10

Online

Online reviews mention no partial credit and notes on the final, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or .

No Partial CreditNotes On Final
“no partial credit”
NATH10
“OK: .”
NATH10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , and presents the material in a step by step format so it is easy to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

83/100

“Katie took a very difficult subject and broke it down in simplified terms.”

📈 Easy A Potential

80/100

“ ”

⚠️ Online Risk

35/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and presents the material in a step by step format so it is easy to understand.
  • She teaches at the and test reflect hw/ in-class material.
  • and always willing to help you understand something

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • you will get an A in her class, with minimal to no studying required.
  • Just go to every class and you'll be fine. As others have said, easy A!
  • Spending at least 2 - 3 hours a weeknight (or 5-6 hours on Sat and Sun) is required to do well.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • Beoga is a terrible sole resource, could work as text supplement.
  • !
  • many fail and "no partial credit"

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews provide detailed and , but the reviews are older and online evidence is limited.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH109 reviews
STATS103 reviews
MATH1101 review
NATH101 review
STAT101 review
Show 2 more courses
STATS1 review
STATSMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1