AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Lucinda Cabral

ESLL237 · ESLL25 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you can teach yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear ExplanationsNot HelpfulConfusing FeedbackLow Teaching Quality
  • and lack of helpful feedback.
  • Students specifically say grammar feedback was not .
  • The overall tone is strongly negative despite only moderate difficulty ratings.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

There is no evidence of , and harder than the difficulty rating suggests.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The subject may not be inherently extreme, but .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

No format-specific attendance policy is supported by the comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

because they describe the explanations as unclear and the help as poor.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

, but feedback problems make the grade path feel unforgiving.

Format shift

and .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The reviews do not describe workload volume, so there is no proof of a heavy or light workload.

Format shift

No online workload evidence exists, and in-person workload evidence is limited.

Teaching experience

Awful

25/100

Both students describe the teaching as .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The only specific assessment .

Format shift

but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

explanations and unhelpful feedback.

Main concern

Students may not get clear guidance or .

What students said

“ .”
ESLL237
“not helpful and ”
ESLL25

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, difficulty, or proctoring policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“not helpful and ”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and feedback. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

20/100

“Didn't enjoy this class.”

📝

35/100

“Teacher didn't mark grammar mistakes, but she asks to fix them.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • not helpful and

Theme 2

📝

  • Teacher didn't mark grammar mistakes, but she asks to fix them.
  • Didn't enjoy this class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

36/100

Evidence confidence

, but their complaints are consistent.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ESLL2371 review
ESLL251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values