AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Brian Oliveira

PSYCH1 · PSYC40 · PSYCF025 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

and if you can learn independently from the textbook.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMonotone LecturesBook-Based TeachingWeak Online CourseLow SupportExam Heavy
  • and poorly guided.
  • material but lectures from the book in a monotone style.
  • Students who self-study and put in extra effort may do okay, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A seems possible with extra effort in person, but the online course gives little structure and makes success harder.

Online evidence suggests poor support, while class easy.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The content is not described as extremely hard, but textbook-heavy teaching and weak guidance make it harder to learn.

Online reviews report confusing structure, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews , though one in-person review says he let students out early.

Neither online nor in-person reviews clearly establish an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is low because the online course is strongly criticized and in-person reviews repeatedly describe monotone, uninspiring teaching.

Online evidence is clearly negative, while but still hesitant.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

as harsh or generous, and success seems tied to extra effort and exams.

Format shift

Online reviews suggest limited credit opportunities, while .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The , but and the online course lacks assignments rather than being easy.

Format shift

Online evidence points to an , while in-person workload evidence is limited.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

He may know the material, but students frequently describe monotone, textbook-based, uninspiring teaching and poor support.

Format shift

Online teaching is described very negatively, while but dull.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

The online review says exams were the main credit source, and an .

Format shift

as the main assessment signal.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as competent but monotone, textbook-based, uninspiring, and hard to reach outside class.

Main concern

Lectures and can reduce interest in the subject.

What students said

“He teaches out of the book but does so very well.”
PSYCH1
“Completely uninspiring.”
PSYC40
“He lectures the whole class with a very very very monotonous voice.”
PSYCH1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is highly negative, citing no study guide, no assignments, weak discussions, poor guidance, and an .

Main concern

The online course appears poorly structured and gives little useful guidance.

What students said

“Broken course, absolute rubbish. Avoid.”
PSYCF025
“ ”
PSYCF025

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show an , but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Exam HeavyFrequent TestsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, midterm, or .

Frequent TestsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy
“ ”
PSYC40

Online

The online review says exams were the main credit source but does .

Exam HeavyReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy
“the only other way to ”
PSYCF025

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Broken course, absolute rubbish. Avoid.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in online risk, teaching style, and exams. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“He lectures the whole class with a very very very monotonous voice.”

⚠️ Online Course Risk

35/100

“Broken course, absolute rubbish. Avoid.”

🧪 Assessment Load

88/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He teaches out of the book but does so very well.
  • Completely uninspiring.
  • He lectures the whole class with a very very very monotonous voice.

Theme 2

💻 About Online Format

  • he still gave useless guidance.
  • Broken course, absolute rubbish. Avoid.

Theme 3

📈

  • if you put in the extra effort the class should be easy.
  • the only other way to

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

, and the comments are old despite being fairly specific.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSYCH12 reviews
PSYC401 review
PSYCF0251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values