AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Robert Hansen

MATH220 · MATH051 · BUCAL2187 · MATH105 · MATH2187 · MATH10 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless you can teach yourself from the book and handle a heavy math workload.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard TestsLots of HomeworkConfusing LecturesBook-Based TeachingUnhelpful With Questions
  • and book-based lectures.
  • Workload is heavy, with , and lots of homework.
  • A few students find him helpful outside class, but the overall tone is negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Hard tests, frequent quizzes, and lots of .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Students , and concepts that are hard to understand.

Only in-person evidence exists, so no format difference can be assessed.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do .

In-person reviews discuss sitting through class but do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students warn against taking him because and the workload is heavy.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students report and a grade.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

18/100

Students repeatedly mention a lot of , and a final.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Several students say he reads or writes from the book and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and at least one project.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a difficult class with , and hard assessments.

Main concern

and questions are not handled well.

What students said

“ , and A LOT of homework.”
BUCAL2187
“ .”
MATH10
“Reads directly from book....I don't understand what he actually does...”
MATH105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and a final, but do not clearly prove book policy or proctoring.

Hard TestsFrequent QuizzesFinal Exam

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Hard TestsFrequent QuizzesFinal Exam
“ , and A LOT of homework.”
BUCAL2187
“ ! I struggled to get a C.”
MATH10
“3 TESTS......1 FINAL......1 GROUP PROJECT.”
MATH10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! He does not answer questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“ , and A LOT of homework.”

⚖️

28/100

“QUIZ EVERY WEEK WHICH ARE ONLY ON LIKE 3 PROBLEMS SO IF YOU MISS 1 ? EXPECT A C.....”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He understands the material, in this case calculus, but has trouble explaining the concepts for all to understand.
  • Reads directly from book....I don't understand what he actually does...
  • He spend most of his time only by writing excessive note without proper lecture.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • ! I struggled to get a C.
  • ALOT OF HOMEWORK....ONLINE HW FOR EVERY SECTION......
  • , and A LOT of homework.

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • Super nice. Really likes to help students "get" math.
  • He took time outside of class .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Nine detailed reviews from 2011 to 2013 show consistent concerns about teaching clarity and workload.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1053 reviews
MATH102 reviews
BUCAL21871 review
MATH0511 review
MATH21871 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH2201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values