Is this an easy A?
FairEffort
68/100Grades seem achievable through homework, projects, and participation, but the and .
All counted evidence is in person, though some comments describe online class experiences inside the review text.
PHOTO57 · CAST52A · COIN82 · CAST92A · FLASHINTR · PHOTOSHOP · 13 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Grades seem achievable through homework, projects, and participation, but the learning curve and unclear assignments can add effort.
All counted evidence is in person, though some comments describe online class experiences inside the review text.
Is the course easy?
The material is practical and well supported, but Photoshop, Dreamweaver, and Flash can have a steep learning curve.
All reviews are counted as in person, with no authoritative online review count.
Is attendance flexible?
Participation is mentioned as part of grading, but reviews do not clearly prove a strict attendance policy.
In-person-counted reviews provide limited attendance evidence, and there are no online-counted reviews.
Is this professor recommended?
Most students strongly recommend her because assignments are useful, feedback is supportive, and they learn a lot.
All recommendation evidence comes from in-person-counted reviews.
Course guide
Grading
Fair
66/100
Grading appears based on projects, homework, and participation with supportive feedback, but unclear expectations hurt some students.
Format shift
All grading evidence is from in-person-counted reviews.
Workload
Moderate
58/100
Assignments are worthwhile and project-based, with a steep learning curve for students new to the tools.
Format shift
All workload evidence is from in-person-counted reviews.
Teaching experience
Excellent
86/100
Most students describe her as organized, knowledgeable, supportive, patient, and responsive despite a few strong complaints.
Format shift
All teaching evidence is from in-person-counted reviews.
Assessment method
FocusOnAssignments
18/100
Reviews explicitly describe grades based on homework, projects, and participation with no traditional tests.
Format shift
All assessment evidence is from in-person-counted reviews.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
Authoritative format counts classify all reviews as in person, and students mostly praise the practical assignments and supportive feedback.
Main concern
Some students found instructions ambiguous or the instructor hard to reach.
What students said
“No traditional tests. Grades based on homework, projects, and participation.”
“The assignments were well-organized, clear, and fun.”
“She is the most ambiguous instructor I have ever had.”
Remote format
Low confidence
No stored summary is available for this format.
Main concern
No main concern is stored for this format.
Exam style
The clearest exam evidence says there are no traditional tests and grades rely on homework, projects, and participation.
Assessment risk
StudentFriendly
88/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person-counted reviews explicitly support no traditional tests and assignment-based grading.
“No traditional tests. Grades based on homework, projects, and participation.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“Andrea's assessments and feedback are spot on.”
“Andrea did a fantastic job on Intro to PhotoShop.”
“No traditional tests. Grades based on homework, projects, and participation.”
“Learning curve a bit steep if you do not know any Photoshop or Dreamweaver going in, but don't let that stop you from taking this class.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
13
Recent reviews read by the AI
13
Lifetime ratings
86/100
Evidence confidence
Thirteen detailed reviews across several years give a strong but somewhat mixed picture of teaching and workload.
Inside 13 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
0 reported outcomes
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values