AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Deborah Stehr

PSYCH1 · PSYC25 · PSYCH · PSYC1 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you mainly want potentially easy or and can tolerate disorganization.

Best fit · Easy A HunterDisorganizedLow ConfidenceEasy Take-Home WorkUnfair ExamsMixed Personality
  • Most reviews criticize her organization, confidence, lecture quality, and timing.
  • Some students found her nice or interesting, but the negative comments are more detailed and severe.
  • Grades may not be conceptually hard, yet unfair timing and subjective dynamics make the class risky.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Some tests and , but unfairness, time pressure, and the need to appease her make the A unreliable.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Psychology content does not sound extremely hard, but poor organization and .

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews mention frequent canceled classes but do .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

The strongest comments warn against taking her because of disorganization, weak lectures, and unfair testing.

All and leans negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Some assessments were easy or take-home, but and harsh timed essays.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Take-home work and easy essay tests suggest manageable work, but and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Reviews repeatedly cite nervous lectures, mistakes, poor organization, and lack of confidence despite a few positive comments.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Assessment evidence includes essay , and a final.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews describe a professor who can be nice and interesting but , and unfair with .

Main concern

Organization, lecture confidence, and .

What students said

“ , but she cancelled class so .”
PSYCH
“Both the midterm and final she gave us 50 mins for with 5 essay questions which she required full detail on the concepts.”
PSYC25
“She frequently made mistakes in details during her lecture.”
PSYC1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

tests in one review and strict timed essay exams in another.

Essay TestsTake-Home WorkTimed MidtermTimed Final

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a timed midterm and final, but no clear proctoring or book policy is proven.

Essay TestsTake-Home WorkTimed MidtermTimed Final
“ , but she cancelled class so .”
PSYCH
“Both the midterm and final she gave us 50 mins for with 5 essay questions which she required full detail on the concepts.”
PSYC25

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She does NOT know what she's doing; and has no concept of time frames.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“She frequently made mistakes in details during her lecture.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

30/100

“ !”

📝

50/100

“Not one person finished!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She lacked confidence in her lectures and was awkward, nervous, bumbling.
  • SHE'S A REALLY COOL TEACHER, AND VERY NICE...
  • made class interesting

Theme 2

🧩 About Organization

  • and has no concept of time frames.
  • She frequently made mistakes in details during her lecture.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , but she cancelled class so .
  • If you want an A, SUCK UP NONSTOP.
  • Both the midterm and final she gave us 50 mins for with 5 essay questions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but the sample is small and dated.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PSYC12 reviews
PSYC251 review
PSYCH1 review
PSYCH11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values