AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Amanda Morgan

ESLESL · ESL177 · ESL165 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

, because the positive grade path is outweighed by inconsistent teaching and fairness concerns.

Best fit · Self Taught ProInconsistent TeachingStrict Late WorkHelpful In TestsMixed Fairness
  • Reviews are sharply split, with two negative experiences and one very positive one.
  • Some students report disorganization and , while and encouraging.
  • An A may be possible in the right class with homework and vocabulary study, but the broader teaching risk is high.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

and vocabulary study can lead to an A, but strict late work and fairness complaints lower confidence.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content does not sound impossible, but poor organization and .

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, but late-work policy is described as strict.

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Most comments raise teaching, organization, and .

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Strict late-work policy and non-objective grade complaints outweigh the one report of help during tests.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Homework and vocabulary study are required, but comments do not show an overwhelming workload.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

The positive helpfulness review is offset by strong complaints about disorganization and lack of teaching ability.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and exams, suggesting a mix of assignments and assessments.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and encouraging to unorganized, strict, and unfair.

Main concern

Students may face weak organization, strict late-work policy, and .

What students said

“She doesnt know how to teach.. ”
ESL165
“ . She is always helping and encouraging her students.”
ESL177

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and exams, but reviews do not clearly prove exam format or proctoring.

Help During Tests And Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams, but does not clearly prove open-book status, proctoring, or format.

Help During Tests And Exams
“She will even help you during the tests and exams.”
ESL177

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She doesnt know how to teach.. ..would listen to you but wont care whether u are learning from this course or not..”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“She doesnt know how to teach.. ”

⚖️

35/100

“Grades are not objective”

📈 Grade Path

58/100

“Do all your hws and study all the vocabs and you will get an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesnt know how to teach..
  • . She is always helping and encouraging her students.

Theme 2

⚖️ About Policies & Grades

  • She got a very strict policy about late works, doesn't helpfull.
  • Grades are not objective
  • Do all your hws and study all the vocabs and you will get an A.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and the comments conflict sharply across courses.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ESL1651 review
ESL1771 review
ESLESL1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values