AI Rate Professor

Physics

Jamie Orr

PHYS4A · PHYS1A · MATH10 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take Jamie Orr if you want a strong physics teacher who rewards real effort with and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear physics teacherFair gradingHelpful test correctionsCaring instructorRequires real work
  • Students consistently describe Jamie Orr as , and .
  • The course requires steady work, but and .
  • Exam evidence points to fair but policies.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic with steady work because and , but students repeatedly say the class requires effort.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Physics is not effortless, but students say and makes the material manageable.

Only in-person reviews are counted, so .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is not explicitly described as mandatory, but class work and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and invested in student learning.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grading is repeatedly called fair, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Students say she makes you work, with , and practice problems, but the workload is not described as excessive.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Most students praise her clarity, helpfulness, responsiveness, and ability to make physics understandable.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

One review describes a balanced mix of , and final.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive, emphasizing , and meaningful chances to improve grades.

Main concern

The material and .

What students said

“Amazingly helpful and clear teacher.”
PHYS4A
“ , but she lets you correct them for half credit back.”
PHYS1A
“She teaches the concepts very well and made physics intriguing.”
PHYS4A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as fair but hard, with and no clear proof of open-book or proctoring policies.

Fair TestsHard TestsMidterm CorrectionsFinal Without Corrections

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exam evidence shows fair but but no final correction option.

Fair TestsHard TestsMidterm CorrectionsFinal Without Corrections
“Quizzes and .”
PHYS4A
“ , but she lets you correct them for half credit back.”
PHYS1A
“The 50% of the ”
PHYS4A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Amazingly helpful and clear teacher. Yes she makes you work, but there is no way to learn the material without some work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“Amazingly helpful and clear teacher.”

⚖️

78/100

“ .”

📘 Effort Required

52/100

“Yes she makes you work, but there is no way to learn the material without some work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She teaches the concepts very well and made physics intriguing.
  • Eager to teach and clarify concepts if you're lost.
  • She knows how to teach physics (amazing)

Theme 2

⚖️

  • .
  • , but she lets you correct them for half credit back.
  • Quizzes and .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • Jamie really wants her students to learn.
  • If you need help, you can e-mail her and .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed in-person reviews show a consistent positive pattern, though they are older and lack grade data.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHYS4A5 reviews
MATH101 review
PHYS1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values