AI Rate Professor

Dental Assisting

Jennifer Bennett

DH200 · INTDH200L · DH200L · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

unless you have no alternative and , and harsh grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh attitudeUnclear expectationsOverloaded workloadHorrendous examsPoor communication
  • Most students strongly warn against taking her because of , and poor communication.
  • The workload is repeatedly described as excessive for a low-unit class.
  • Exams and as harsh, nitpicky, and poorly aligned with study guidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears hard because students , and unclear expectations.

All authoritative evidence is in person, even though some comments refer to online experiences.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The class feels difficult because students must memorize modules and handle professional-level material with limited guidance.

All counted evidence is in person; no separate online evidence can be used.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, though students complain about the professor's own attendance and punctuality.

In-person comments mention punctuality issues but do not prove a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students overwhelmingly advise avoiding her because of rude communication, poor clarity, excessive workload, and harsh exams.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students report , and exams that do not match study guides.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Multiple students say the course has far too much work for one to 1.5 units.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Some subject knowledge is acknowledged, but most comments describe poor attitude, unclear expectations, slow responses, and lack of support.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Students mention modules, , and final exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Authoritative counts classify all reviews as in person, and the comments are , and attitude.

Main concern

Students report , and too much work for the course units.

What students said

“This class was way too much work for a one unit class.”
DH200
“The .”
DH200
“" "”
DH200

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe exams as harsh and poorly aligned with guidance, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book policy.

Horrendous ExamsMidtermsLab FinalFinal ExamSpecific Study Guide Mismatch

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exam, and horrendous exams, but do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book policy.

Horrendous ExamsMidtermsLab FinalFinal Exam
“The .”
DH200
“she schedules 2 midterms, in-class writing, and .”
DH200
“Two weeks later is a final.”
DH200

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you can find another teacher do it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting recurring problems in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

18/100

“ !!”

📚 Workload Pressure

15/100

“This class was way too much work for a one unit class.”

⚖️

18/100

“She nitpicks and takes off pts for things she doesn't clearly state on her syllabus or online instead of encouraging.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She definitely talks down to her students as if they are idiotic children, when in reality we are trying to learn.
  • Sadly, she is not a facilitator to impart knowledge.
  • She is an overall good teacher when it comes to the subject, just has a poor attitude.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Difficulty

  • Too hard for 1.5 units.
  • This class was way too much work for a one unit class.
  • MEMORIZE THE MODULES & the answers to the

Theme 3

🧪

  • The .
  • she gave us a SPECIFIC study guide, but tested us on the exact opposite.
  • She nitpicks and takes off pts for things she doesn't clearly state on her syllabus or online instead of encouraging.

Theme 4

📣 About Communication

  • If you ask her a question be prepared to get an answer a week later
  • She disappears for days at a time only to reappear with outrageous demands on your time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 11 reviews over several years are detailed and , and communication.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 56
1 out of 52

Course coverage

DH2006 reviews
DH200L4 reviews
INTDH200L1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values