AI Rate Professor

Biology

Vidyodhaya Sundaram

BIOL11 · BIO1A · BIO40C · BIOLABIOL · BIOL10 · BIOL1A · BIOL40C · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

unless you are comfortable learning mostly from the textbook and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesDisorganized labsHard ambiguous examsSelf-study requiredNot recommended
  • Most students describe the teaching as .
  • as hard, ambiguous, or poorly written.
  • A and helpful when students showed effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

An A because students describe unclear teaching and hard or ambiguous exams.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Some material is basic, but the professor often and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students do not recommend her because the course feels disorganized, unclear, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

because exams are hard, ambiguous, and sometimes poorly worded.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload is not always described as huge, but students must compensate with .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most reviews describe unclear lectures, poor preparation, limited help, and disorganization.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Reviews mention quizzes, labs, and quality.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, emphasizing unclear lectures, weak organization, and difficult or ambiguous tests.

Main concern

because lectures and answers are often described as unclear.

What students said

“Lecture is a total waste of time.”
BIO40C
“ .”
BIOL11
“It is a self-study course.. background.”
BIO1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often described as extremely hard, ambiguous, and poorly worded, but reviews do not clearly prove book or .

Hard ExamsAmbiguous QuestionsMultiple Choice Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

24/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews support hard and ambiguous exams, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring policy.

Hard ExamsAmbiguous QuestionsMultiple Choice Exams
“ !”
BIOL40C
“The wording on the should be”
BIO1A
“ , and sometimes they have multiple answers.”
BIO1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It is a self-study course.. background.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“She passes through the slides as if she were skimming through them for herself.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

20/100

“ .”

📝

24/100

“ and ambiguous answers that are often wrong.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and difficult. .
  • Lecture is a total waste of time.
  • she is a nice lady but a bad teacher. very bad.

Theme 2

📈

  • !
  • , and sometimes they have multiple answers.
  • Bio1A should be an easy class, but this teacher made it hard.

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • If you show you are trying, she WILL help you.
  • If you ask her questions, often she'll tell you to look in the book.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across several years give consistent evidence of unclear teaching and .

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 55

Course coverage

BIO1A6 reviews
BIO40C1 review
BIOL101 review
BIOL111 review
BIOL1A1 review
Show 2 more courses
BIOL40C1 review
BIOLABIOL1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values