AI Rate Professor

Foothill College · Art History

Yaya Deluna

HIST10 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

, but treat the conclusion cautiously because there is only one comment.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAvoid stronglyConfusing explanationsWhim gradingTextbook adds littleLow credibility sample
  • The only review is strongly negative and .
  • The student says the class is hard because and .
  • Evidence is limited to one review, so confidence is low despite the strong tone.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A appears difficult because the and the class is a daily battle.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course is described as hard because the professor is difficult to understand and adds little beyond the textbook.

, so no online comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

The only evidence is in person, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only because teaching is unclear and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

The only review says she grades on a whim, suggesting unpredictable and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The review calls the class a daily battle, though .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

The review says she is hard to understand and adds nothing beyond the textbook.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not clearly describe whether .

Format shift

Assessment evidence is too limited and only in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person review is extremely negative, , and no added value beyond the textbook.

Main concern

The and teaching adds little beyond the textbook.

What students said

“ !”
HIST10
“Difficult to understand, grades on a whim, and adds nothing to textbook.”
HIST10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, or open-book policies.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“Difficult to understand, grades on a whim, and adds nothing to textbook.”

⚖️

20/100

“grades on a whim”

👍 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Difficult to understand, grades on a whim, and adds nothing to textbook.
  • It's a hard class but not for the right reasons.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • grades on a whim
  • Been a battle every day.

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • !
  • There's a reason why she's only a part time online only "teacher"

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, even though it is detailed and strongly negative.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HIST101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values