AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Juanita Croft

CIS68C1 · CIS68C2 · CIS068A · CIS68A · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Take her if you want a supportive instructor with manageable grading, but be .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful and encouragingClear for some studentsEasy gradingVague assignmentsTheory-heavy
  • Most reviews praise her as helpful, respectful, and willing to support students outside class.
  • Grading and in one review.
  • One and lack of response, so the experience may depend on course fit.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Getting an A looks relatively manageable because students , and , though vague assignments can raise the effort cost.

All because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The content seems manageable overall, but some students found the material vague, theory-heavy, or .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do .

, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

, and encouraging, but one severe negative review limits confidence.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students describe her as an and mention easy exams and open note/book tests.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Workload seems manageable, but documentation and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

, and encouraging, but one student says she was vague and unresponsive.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Reviews mention assignments, documentation, handouts, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, with students emphasizing helpfulness, easy exams, and , though one review reports vague assignments and weak support.

Main concern

Some students may need to self-study because assignments and .

What students said

“An excellent teacher. and very respectful to every level of student.”
CIS68A
“She's an but she will NOT teach you anything.”
CIS68C1
“Very helpful and encouraging.”
CIS68C2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is student-friendly because reviews mention easy exams and open note/book tests.

Easy ExamsOpen Note TestsOpen Book Tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and open note/book tests.

Easy ExamsOpen Note TestsOpen Book Tests
“ ”
CIS68C1
“ ”
CIS68C2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very helpful and encouraging.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and ; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“An excellent teacher. and very respectful to every level of student.”

📈

82/100

“She's an but she will NOT teach you anything.”

🧪

84/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • An excellent teacher. and very respectful to every level of student.
  • Very helpful and encouraging.
  • The and I've had four other unix/linux teachers.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload and Clarity

  • so vague even programmers have a .
  • A lot of material to get through
  • Documentation is a large part.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams and Grading

  • She's an but she will NOT teach you anything.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Five older reviews give mixed but useful detail, with a mostly consistent positive pattern and one strong negative outlier.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CIS68C12 reviews
CIS068A1 review
CIS68A1 review
CIS68C21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values